Deconstruct the iPad with the Task Force on American Innovation

Those in the Washington, D.C. area next Wednesday, September 21, may want to attend a Congressional briefing hosted by the Task Force on American Innovation (ACM and USACM have participated in Task Force efforts in the past). The briefing is also hosted by Representatives Hultgren (Illinois), McCaul (Texas), and Quayle (Arizona).

Titled Deconstructing the iPad, the event is a panel discussion highlighting how federally funded research supports technological innovations. The speakers are:

Moderator
Luis von Ahn, Carnegie Mellon University; founder of ReCAPTCHA

Guest Speakers
Martin Izzard, Texas Instruments
William Phillips, Nobel Laureate; National Institute of Standards and Technology; University of Maryland
Benjamin Bederson, University of Maryland; Zumobi, Inc.

The briefing will take place on Wednesday, September 21, in room 2325 of the Rayburn House Office Building in Washington. Please RSVP to Jodi Lieberman at lieberman@aps.org

Posted in Events, Innovation | Comments closed

Hill Tech Happenings, Week of September 12

September 14

Hearing: The Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit Subcommittee of the House Financial Services Committee will hold a hearing on cybercrime and the financial sector.
10 a.m., 2128 Rayburn Building

September 15

Hearing:
The Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade Subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee will hold a hearing on the U.S. impacts of European Internet privacy regulations.
9:30 a.m., 2322 Rayburn Building

Markup:
The Senate Judiciary Committee will review pending legislation and nominations, including bills involving data security.
10 a.m., 226 Dirksen Building

Posted in Events | Comments closed

Hill Tech Happenings, Week of September 6

Congress has returned from its August recess. The Fiscal Year 2012 budget should be high on the agenda, as that year starts October 1.

September 7

Hearing
The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing to discuss updates to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
10 a.m., 226 Dirksen Building

Posted in Events | Comments closed

Policy Highlights from Communications of the ACM – July 2011 (Vol. 54, No. 7)

Below is a list of items with policy relevance from the July issue of Communications of the ACM. As always, much of the material in CACM is premium content, and free content one month may slip behind a pay wall the next. You need to be a member of ACM or a subscriber to CACM to access premium content online.

News: Technology
Automotive Autonomy by Alex Wright
A description of recent advances in automating automobiles, focusing on efforts support by Google and the European Union.

Viewpoint: Legally Speaking
Too Many Copyrights? by Pamela Samuelson
The author describes the current lack of copyright registration requirements and whether reinstating them makes sense.
Read More »

Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

USACM Notes Concerns with Proposed SSA Online Authentication Process

Like many federal agencies, the Social Security Administration (SSA) is trying to provide more services in a time of limited resources. As part of its efforts to better serve the public, the SSA is working on an online authentication system to help ensure that the people it is interacting with online are indeed the people they claim to be, and qualified for the services they are requesting.

To address the first part, the SSA submitted a notice of information collection that is connected to online authentication. The intention is to issue a User ID for everyone seeking to access SSA services online, and several ways to authenticate that identity. (People will still be able to access services in person or over the phone.)

USACM responded to the notice with some concerns over the proposed authentication system. While USACM is encouraged by additional attention to authentication for online services, the proposed system is insufficient.
Read More »

Posted in Privacy and Security | Comments closed

Policy Highlights from Communications of the ACM – June 2011 (Vol. 54, No. 6)

Below is a list of items with policy relevance from the June issue of Communications of the ACM. As always, much of the material in CACM is premium content, and free content one month may slip behind a pay wall the next. You need to be a member of ACM or a subscriber to CACM to access premium content online.

Column: Privacy and Security
Identity Management and Privacy: A Rare Opportunity to Get it Right by Ari Shapiro
The Senior Internet Policy Advisor at the National Institute of Standards and Technology discusses how the proposed National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace offers a way to protect privacy, assure identities, and maintain the benefits of the Internet.

Practice
Does Deterrence Work in Reducing Information Security Policy Abuse by Employees? by Qing Hu, Zhengchuan Xu, Tamara Dinev and Hong Ling
A review of the authors research in the relationships between security policies and behavior in corporate settings, with an emphasis on how effective deterrence is in reducing violations.

Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

USACM Summer Recap: Comments on NSTIC Governance

Often things slow down in the summer, but that’s not been the case for USACM this year. We’ve been busy commenting on various government proposals related to computing and will post about that work over the next few days.

The National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace (NSTIC) is a government-wide effort to work with the private sector to provide identity verification options for consumers and providers. This is intended to maintain or improve confidence in online transactions. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) staff wrote about the program in a recent issue of CACM (subscription required), and USACM commented on an NSTIC draft in 2009. There is a targeted implementation date of 2016. While that is far off, there is much work to do, starting with how to manage NSTIC.

NIST issued a notice of inquiry on NSTIC governance in early June, and USACM responded to questions on how this strategy should be guided moving forward. Our comments focused on the need for good governance to ensure trust in NSTIC – something critical to its effective function. Besides recommending that relevant technical and international experience be included on any NSTIC governance structure, our comments argued for ensuring that vacancies be filled promptly, and that NSTIC staff should review several existing technical bodies for insights on how to develop a governance structure.

Preliminary efforts on setting up NSTIC continue. With two workshops held so far this summer and another expected soon, there should be additional opportunities for public comment.

Posted in ACM/USACM News, Privacy and Security | Comments closed

Policy Highlights from Communications of the ACM – May 2011 (Vol. 54, No. 5)

Below is a list of items with policy relevance from the May issue of Communications of the ACM. As always, much of the material in CACM is premium content, and free content one month may slip behind a pay wall the next. You need to be a member of ACM or a subscriber to CACM to access premium content online.

Letters
Technology Has Social Consequences by Moshe Y. Vardi
CACM’s editor describes how changes in technology have affected norms and practices around reviewers and conference program committee members.

News: Society
Data Optimization in Developing Nations by Leah Hoffman
A sketch of how data collection and analysis can be utilized for issues in the developing world.

Viewpoint: Economic and Business Dimensions
Online Advertising, Behavioral Targeting, and Privacy by Avi Goldfarb and Catherine E. Tucker
A review of recent surveys on the impact of European Union regulations on targeted online advertising.
Read More »

Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

Former Microsoft Executive to Replace Kundra as Federal CIO

Shortly before Vivek Kundra’s scheduled departure from the position of federal Chief Information Officer, the White House has named his replacement.

Steven VanRoekel moves into the position from the U.S. Agency for International Development, where he was its Executive Director of Citizen and Organizational Engagement. He worked for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) before that, serving as managing director. Part of his responsibilities at the FCC included implementing many of the federal IT initiatives that Kundra initiated, including consolidation of data centers and moving services to cloud computing where practical. Prior to federal service VanRoekel worked at Microsoft for 15 years, including serving as Senior Director for the Windows Server and Tools Division.

USACM has been most engaged with the CIO’s work through Data.gov and the efforts to put more data available online in usable formats. This work is far from complete, and we expect to be engaged with at least this aspect of Mr. VanRoekel’s work going forward.

Posted in Digital Government | Comments closed

Hill Tech Happenings, Week of August 1

Yes, there is more to Washington right now than negotiations and voting on the results.

August 2
Briefing:

The Strategic Forces Subcommittee of the Senate Armed Services Committee will receive a closed briefing on cybersecurity.
2:30 p.m., Capitol Visitors Center

August 3

Hearing:
House Science, Space and Technology Committee will hold a hearing on the possible impacts of a mobile broadband network on scientific research activities.
10 a.m., 2318 Rayburn Building

The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on updating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
10 a.m., 226 Dirksen Building
Read More »

Posted in Events | Comments closed

Hill Tech Happenings, Week of July 25

July 26

Hearing:

The Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee will hold a hearing on cybersecurity and critical infrastructure.
11 a.m., 2322 Rayburn Building

Posted in Events | Comments closed

Hill Tech Happenings, Week of July 11

July 11

Meeting:
The Data Privacy and Integrity Advisory Committee of the Department of Homeland Security will meet.
10 a.m., 111 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.

July 13

Meeting:
The Information Security and Privacy Advisory Board will meet (continues through July 15)
8 a.m., Homewood Suites, 1475 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.

July 14

Meeting:
The Information Security and Privacy Advisory Board meeting continues.
8 a.m., Homewood Suites, 1475 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
Read More »

Posted in Events | Comments closed

Policy Highlights from Communications of the ACM – April 2011 (Vol. 54, No. 4)

Below is a list of items with policy relevance from the April issue of Communications of the ACM. As always, much of the material in CACM is premium content, and free content one month may slip behind a pay wall the next. You need to be a member of ACM or a subscriber to CACM to access premium content online.

Letters
Educating Computing’s Next Generation by Robert B. Schnabel
The chair of ACM’s Education Policy Committee describes the charge and activities of the Committee.

News: Society
Social Games, Virtual Goods by Samuel Greengard
A brief update on how online games and the currency used in those games can have physical world impacts.

News: Academia
British Computer Scientists Reboot by Sarah Underwood
How one computer science department in a U.K. university is struggling with budget cuts and poor research rankings.
Read More »

Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

Hill Tech Happenings, Week of July 4

July 7

Hearing:
The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee will hold a hearing on cybersecurity threats and threat assessment.

Posted in Events | Comments closed

Hill Tech Happenings, Week of June 27

June 29

Hearing:
The Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee will hold a hearing on consumer data privacy.
10 a.m., 253 Russell Building

The House Financial Services Committee will hold a field hearing on cybercrime and financial institutions.
2 p.m., National Computer Forensics Institute, 2020 Valleydale Rd. Hoover, Ala.

Posted in Events | Comments closed

House Judiciary Committee Approves Patent Reform Bill; Full House May Consider it Soon

Patent reform is one of many issues that has been stalled in the halls of Congress over the last several years. However, this particular effort may get somewhere soon. H.R. 1249, the America Invents Act, was approved by the House Judiciary Committee and reported to the full House for consideration and a vote. The White House has weighed in with its support, and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Leahy welcomed the progress.

However, a compromise that brought the bill to the House floor may jeopardize the chances of its passage. The specific issue that brought the compromise concerns fee recovery. At the moment, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) cannot retain all of the money it receives through application and other fees. The America Invents Act initially proposed allowing USPTO to retain all of this money. However, House appropriators objected to that proposal, and agreed to consider the bill only if so-called excess funds where set aside for USPTO, subject to House appropriations. The Patent office is chronically understaffed, so the additional money could be put to good use. However, with the current budget climate, requiring excess funds to be routed back to the office via appropriations runs the risk of that money never getting to USPTO.

This compromise has prompted some additional resistance to the bill, which has never enjoyed universal support from either party. Read More »

Posted in Intellectual Property | Comments closed

Policy Highlights from Communications of the ACM – March 2011 (Vol. 54, No. 3)

Below is a list of items with policy relevance from the March issue of Communications of the ACM. As always, much of the material in CACM is premium content, and free content one month may slip behind a pay wall the next. You need to be a member of ACM or a subscriber to CACM to access premium content online.

News: Research and Development

Evaluating Government Funding by Tom Geller
Article reviews the December 2010 report from the President’s Council of Advisers on Science and Technology on federal investments in networking and information technology research.

News: In Memoriam
Gary Chapman, Technologist: 1952-2010
A remembrance of Chapman, who served as the first Executive Director of Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility.

Viewpoints: Legally Speaking
Do You Own the Software You Buy? by Pamela Samuelson
Samuelson reviews recent court decisions and how they affect the resale of software.

Viewpoints: Computing Ethics
Surrounded by Machines by Kenneth D. Pimple
Review of a recent workshop on the ethics of pervasive and autonomous information technology.
Read More »

Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

Hill Tech Happenings, Week of June 20

Cybersecurity appears to be the word for committees this week.

June 21

Hearing:

The Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee will hold a hearing on cybersecurity in the financial sector.
10 a.m., 538 Dirksen Building

The Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism of the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on the administration’s cybersecurity proposals.
2:30 p.m., 226 Dirksen Building

June 22

Hearing:

The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on enforcing intellectual property laws.
10 a.m., 226 Dirksen Building

June 24

Hearing:

The Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection and Security Technologies Subcommittee of the House Homeland Security Committee will hold a hearing on the administration’s cybersecurity proposals.
10 a.m., 311 Cannon Building

Posted in Events | Comments closed

Hill Tech Happenings, Week of June 13

June 14

Conference:

The Computers, Freedom and Privacy Conference takes place (continues through June 16)
Georgetown University Law Center, 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C.

June 15

Hearing:

The Commerce, Trade and Manufacturing subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee will hold a hearing on proposed consumer data protection legislation.
10 a.m., 2322 Rayburn Building

June 16

Hearing:

The Oversight subcommittee of the Committee on House Administration will hold a hearing on information delivery in the House.
10 a.m., 1310 Longworth Building

Posted in Events | Comments closed

Hill Tech Happenings, Week of May 31

UPDATE (June 1) – The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing scheduled for June 1 has been postponed.

While the Senate is not in session this week, the House is.

June 1

Hearing:

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee will hold a hearing on cybersecurity.
9:30 a.m., 2154 Rayburn Building

The Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on online commerce and intellectual property.
1:30 2:00 p.m., 2141 Rayburn Building

June 2

Hearing:

The Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade Subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee will hold a hearing on the Sony and Epsilon data breaches.
9 a.m., 2123 Rayburn Building

Posted in Events | Comments closed

Hill Tech Happenings, Week of May 23

May 23

Hearing:

The Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee will hold a hearing on the Administration’s cybersecurity proposal.
10:30 a.m., 342 Dirksen Building

May 25

Hearing:

The Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet Subcommittee and the Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee will hold a joint hearing on cybersecurity
10 a.m., 2141 Rayburn Building

The Subcommittee on National Security, Homeland Defense and Foreign Operations of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee will hold a hearing on cybersecurity threat assessment.
1:30 p.m., 2154 Rayburn Building
Read More »

Posted in Events | Comments closed

Hill Tech Happenings, Week of May 16

May 19

Meeting:
The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology will meet. The meeting will be webcast.
9 a.m., Marriott Metro Center, 775 12th Street NW

Hearing:
The Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee will hold a hearing on consumer protection and privacy in mobile devices.
10 a.m., 253 Russell Building

Meeting:
The Department of Homeland Security’s Data Privacy and Integrity Advisory Committee will meet via teleconference. Open to the public, but the number of lines is limited.
11 a.m.

Posted in Events | Comments closed

Has the Cybersecurity Logjam Broke?

Congress has been making noise about passing comprehensive cybersecurity legislation for most of the last two years, prompted in part by the Obama Administration’s cyberspace policy review in 2009. Nearly two years later, the Administration has released a legislative proposal in cybersecurity that may help push legislation further along. Depending on how you count, there are nearly 50 different measures pending in Congress dealing with some aspect of cybersecurity, so a push should help.

The full Administration proposal is available online, as well as section-by-section analysis and a fact sheet. You can also look at specific parts of the proposal (see the May 12, 2011 entries), which are listed below:

  • Changes in criminal penalties for several computer-related or computer-enabled offenses
  • Data Breach Notification requirements
  • Codifies Department of Homeland Security responsibilities for civilian cybersecurity
  • Sets cybersecurity requirements for critical infrastructure systems
  • Updates the Federal Information Security Management Act
  • Some of these topics have been covered in current cybersecurity legislation or bills that were introduced in previous sessions of Congress. So in many cases, there isn’t a disagreement on whether or not a certain law is necessary, but there may be disagreement on exactly how that law should be written. And while the Administration has introduced this legislation in one large package, there is no way of knowing exactly how the package will be handled in Congress. The Senate has a placeholder bill ready to handle a single cybersecurity bill, but it’s just as possible that Congress will seek to move quickly on those bills that already have broad support ahead of new proposals or other proposals that still require negotiation.

    Posted in Privacy and Security | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of May 9

    May 12

    Hearing:

    The Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee will hold a hearing on the economic impacts of cyber attacks (previously scheduled for late March).
    10 a.m., 253 Russell Building

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    Sony-Prompted Hearing Features Testimony from USACM Chair

    Prompted by the massive data breaches of Sony’s networks, the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade of the House Energy and Commerce Committee held a hearing May 3 on data theft and its effects on consumers. One of the witnesses was USACM Chair Eugene Spafford. The committee has a webpage on the hearing, which includes links to an archived webcast and the written testimony of all four witnesses. You can also read Dr. Spafford’s testimony and the USACM press release covering it.

    While Sony and Epsilon (an email marketing company that recently suffered its own data breach) were invited to testify, they declined to appear. This presented an excellent political opportunity for the members of Congress at the hearing, and the subcommittee chair suggested in press reports she may again invite Sony to testify. The witnesses that attended were from two government agencies heavily involved in data breach prevention and investigation – the Federal Trade Commission and the Secret Service, and legal and technical experts that provided useful context to both the recent data breaches, and the longer-term problems in this area (publicly reported data breaches have affected at least 600 million records since 2005).

    The Energy and Commerce Committee has worked on data privacy and data breach legislation in the past, and may try to use the recent breaches to push their legislation further through Congress than they have been able to before. The witnesses all supported some form of data privacy legislation to address not only data breaches and notification, but also effective information security practices. The large majority of these breaches could be mitigated by better implementation of best practices in this area. Many of the questions and answers reflected the long work of this committee in the area, though their questions suggested that companies have not been effective in communicating why they may not be able to immediately notify consumers in the event of a breach.

    Posted in ACM/USACM News, Privacy and Security | Comments closed

    USACM Chair to Testify on Data Breaches

    Prompted by the recent data breaches of the PlayStation Network and the email marketing company Epsilon, the Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade Subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee will hold a hearing this Wednesday, May 4, on data breaches. They have invited USACM Chair Eugene Spafford to testify. His testimony will focus on the technical aspects of holding and managing consumer data securely, and the threats against such information. The hearing will be available online, via the House Energy and Commerce Committee website. A link should be available by the time of the hearing, 9:30 a.m. Eastern on Wednesday. While the Subcommittee has inquired with both Sony (the manufacturer of PlayStation) and Epsilon about their breaches, they are currently not going to attend Wednesdays hearing.

    Posted in ACM/USACM News, Events, Privacy and Security | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of May 2

    May 3

    Hearing:

    The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee will hold a hearing on updating the Presidential Records Act to better handle electronic records.
    9:30 a.m., 2154 Rayburn Building

    May 4

    Hearing:

    The Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade of the House Energy and Commerce Committee will hold a hearing on the threat of data thefts to American consumers. Recent Playstation and Epsilon breaches are likely to be a focus of the hearing.
    9:30 a.m., 2322 Rayburn Building

    The Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet of the House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on Internet domain name oversight.
    10 a.m., 2141 Rayburn Building

    May 5

    Hearing:

    The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee will hold a hearing on the economic impact of cyber attacks. The hearing will focus on a discussion draft of cybersecurity legislation focused on the power and electricity infrastructure.
    9:30 a.m., 366 Dirksen Building

    The Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet of the House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on Internet competition.
    10 a.m., 2141 Rayburn Building

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    Policy Highlights from Communications of the ACM – February 2011 (Vol. 54, No. 2)

    Below is a list of items with policy relevance from the February issue of Communications of the ACM. As always, much of the material in CACM is premium content, and free content one month may slip behind a pay wall the next. You need to be a member of ACM or a subscriber to CACM to access premium content online.

    News: Technology
    Chipping Away at Greenhouse Gases, by Gregory Goth
    Review of processor algorithms that could lead to significant cost and energy savings. Also considered are the new research questions posed by the new technologies.

    News: Society
    Following the Crowd by Samuel Greengard
    Discussion of crowdsourcing and how private and public sector organizations have tapped into the phenomenon.

    Viewpoints: Privacy and Security
    Against Cyberterrorism by Maura Conway
    The author argues why cyber-based terrorist attacks aren’t as likely to occur as might be commonly thought.

    Viewpoints: Economic and Business Dimensions
    Household Demand for Broadband Internet Service by Gregory Rosston, Scott Savage and Donald Waldman
    A consumer survey indicates what people are willing to pay for various speeds of Internet service.

    Viewpoints: Education
    From Science to Engineering by Mark Guzdial
    The need for finding and measuring better ways to teach computer science is explored, with comparisons to physics and engineering education.

    Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

    Policy Highlights from Communications of the ACM – January 2011 (Vol. 54, No. 1)

    Below is a list of items with policy relevance from the January issue of Communications of the ACM. As always, much of the material in CACM is premium content, and free content one month may slip behind a pay wall the next. You need to be a member of ACM or a subscriber to CACM to access premium content online.

    News: Society
    India’s Elephantine Effort by Marina Krakovsky
    Description of India’s efforts to establish a biometric ID program, in part to do better in delivering government subsidies to the people who are supposed to receive them.

    Viewpoints: Law and Technology
    Google AdWords and European Trademark Law by Stefan Bechtold
    The article reviews recent trademark infringement cases involving keyword searches and what liability Google may have in such matters.

    Viewpoint
    Cloud Computing Privacy Concerns on Our Doorstop by Mark D. Ryan
    Using the example of conference management systems, the author outlines the risks and benefits of cloud computing services.

    Contributed Articles
    Follow the Intellectual Property by Gio Wiederhold
    While movement of jobs between countries has occupied much attention in policy debates, the article focuses on the associated movement of intellectual property rights.

    Review Article
    A Firm Foundation for Private Data Analysis by Cynthia Dwork
    A review of the technical challenges of Differential Privacy – analyzing database information without disclosing private information about people in the database.

    Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

    Administration Issues National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace

    Last Friday the Obama Administration released its National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace (NSTIC), a plan to leverage private sector tools to make it easier for some kinds of transactions to happen online. This would include both consumer and government transactions, and attempt to establish a system where identity can be confirmed online in a way that is much more certain than what is commonly done online.

    The strategy outlines the establishment of an Identity Ecosystem that would “securely support transactions that range from anonymous to fully-authenticated and from low- to high-value.” This statement recognizes that some aspects of the Internet not only do not need identities to be confirmed to the same extent desired for something like a mortgage contract, but can thrive on anonymity. As the Strategy envisions this Ecosystem, various credentials and other means of authenticating or authorizing a person for certain activities or transactions would be established (likely evolving from some of what’s currently available). These items could then be used when a person seeks to access a number of different goods and services online. One of the selling points to consumers would be that this Ecosystem would reduce the need to maintain a number of different identities and/or passwords to operate on the web.

    While NSTIC envisions the private sector doing a fair amount of work, the government will proceed with establishing an implementation plan and a national program office to coordinate efforts. Arguably it is in the implementation plan, and how well it is followed, that will determine the success or failure of the strategy. In order for there to be trusted identities online, there must be trust in the tools used and in the entities charged with operating those tools. As this usually has required nudging to take place in other parts of the online landscape, it seems unlikely that this strategy will not be successfully implemented without trust.

    Last summer USACM issued comments on a draft of NSTIC. Those comments reflect the concerns expressed above concerning successful implementation and management of this strategy. They still make good sense moving forward with implementation of the Strategy. Issuing this document is the first step in what will likely be a long, multi-year process. It’s not too late to read the Strategy and follow the issue as the implementation plan is developed.

    Posted in Privacy and Security | Comments closed

    USACM Vice-Chair Testifies on Challenges of Electronic Employment Verification

    On April 14, Dr. Annie Ant?n, Vice Chair of USACM and Professor in the Computer Science Department of North Carolina State University, testified in front of the Social Security Subcommittee of the House Ways and Means Committee. She was one of the witnesses at a hearing on the Social Security Administration’s role in verifying employment eligibility. Other witnesses included staff from the Social Security Administration, the Government Accountability Office, and public interest groups interested in the issue. You can watch the hearing online.

    Dr. Ant?n’s testimony focused on the effectiveness of E-Verify, an electronic system of employment verification used in a number of states for an increasing number of employers, with over 16 million queries in fiscal year 2010. USACM has testified on E-Verify and/or electronic employment eligibility before, in 2008 and 2007.

    Highlights of Dr. Ant?n’s testimony included:

    • The E-Verify system cannot effectively detect individuals who use stolen or forged identities. A 2009 evaluation of E-Verify found that 54 percent of illegal immigrants checked by the system were incorrectly identified as employment-eligible for that reason.
    • Proper validation and testing of systems prior to widespread use will help minimize the possibilities of failure, which can contribute to additional identity theft and fraud.
    • Mission creep for a system like E-Verify can lead to additional technical issues, leading to cost and/or schedule overruns and increased security vulnerabilities.

    As this is the third time USACM has testified on this issue, it seems likely that the issue will continue to be a concern for Congress going forward.

    Posted in ACM/USACM News, Events, Privacy and Security | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of April 11

    April 12

    Hearing:

    The Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information, Federal Services, and International Security of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee will hold a hearing on executive branch plans to combat wasteful IT spending
    10:30 a.m., 342 Dirksen Building

    The Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism of the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on cybersecurity and cybercrime
    2:30 p.m., 226 Dirksen Building

    April 14

    Hearing:

    The Social Security Subcommittee of the House Ways and Means Committee will hold a hearing on the Social Security Administration’s obligations in electronic employment eligibility verification. USACM Co-Chair Dr. Annie Antón is one of the scheduled witnesses.
    2 p.m., B-318 Rayburn Building

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of April 4

    April 6

    Hearing:

    The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.
    10 a.m., 226 Dirksen Building

    The Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet of the House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on Internet commerce.
    10:45 a.m., 2141 Rayburn Building

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of March 28

    UPDATE: The March 29 hearing on cyber attacks has been postponed. No new date has been scheduled.

    March 29

    Hearing:

    The Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee will hold a hearing on the economic impacts of cyber attacks.
    2:30 p.m., 253 Dirksen Building

    March 30

    Hearing:

    The Subcommittee in Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet of the House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on the America Invents Act (this year’s effort at patent reform legislation).
    1:30 p.m., 2141 Rayburn Building

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    Google Books Settlement Remains Unsettled

    The ongoing saga of the Google Books case will continue, according to a recent opinion from the judge overseeing the negotiated settlement. Google Books prompted a 2005 suit for copyright infringement because the service offered snippets of copyrighted material for viewing free-of-charge. The parties in the class action suit have been wrestling over a settlement since 2008. The most recent version of the settlement would, among other things, set up a registry for so-called orphan works (items still in copyright, but without an identifiable rights holder) and allow Google to make more of the copyrighted works it has scanned available for view and possibly for printing. Rights holders would receive some compensation for this permission and associated sales, but Google would retain exclusive access rights to a large number of books (though libraries and universities would be able to purchase subscriptions).

    There are several concerns about the settlement, including the status of international rights holders (the matter is a U.S. court case), and possible privacy infringements for those who browse Google Books. But the focus of this week’s opinion was on two areas: the copyright for orphan works and antitrust concerns. Each of those two areas relates to another concern – that the proposed settlement goes beyond addressing the harms that brought the suit about in the first place. The arrangements to handle distribution and copyright claims for orphan works are better suited for Congress to decide than the courts, and the initial case was limited to the showing of snippets of copyrighted material, not of whole works of copyrighted material.

    As envisioned in the settlement, it would be possible for a copyright owner to lose their rights because they do not opt out of the agreement. This is a noted break with past practice with respect to copyright owners, who are generally considered to have the right to do (or not) what they wish with respect to their works, and other parties seeking to use the work have the responsibility to obtain rights to it. Because orphan works are a significant portion of the works at issue in this case, it would be possible for someone who owns the copyright to a work to have it used by Google not only without their consent but without their knowledge.

    From the antitrust perspective, because Google is the only private entity engaged in the scanning of large amounts of copyrighted material (especially orphan works), they would have significant advantages in the markets for these works and for indexes to this work. Third parties can access, index, and display snippets of material Google has, but only if they have entered into agreements with Google. Part of the advantage to Google in market dominance comes from the shifts in copyright burden from third parties to copyright holders.

    The court has kept open the possibility of another revised settlement, encouraging the parties in its opinion to consider shifting the opt out requirement of the agreement to an opt in. This would appear to address most of the copyright concerns outlined in its opinion. A settlement conference is scheduled for April 25 to discuss further progress in the matter.

    Posted in Intellectual Property | Comments closed

    Policy Highlights from Communications of the ACM – December 2010 (Vol. 53, No. 12)

    Below is a list of items with policy relevance from the December issue of Communications of the ACM. As always, much of the material in CACM is premium content, and free content one month may slip behind a pay wall the next. You need to be a member of ACM or a subscriber to CACM to access premium content online.

    News: Education
    CSEdWeek Expands Its Reach by Marina Krakovsky
    A review of computer science education to note the second Computer Science Education Week held in December 2010.

    News: Society
    The New Face of War by Samuel Greengard
    A review of current and future possibilities in cyberattacks framed by the Stuxnet worm.

    News: Forum
    A Matter of Privacy by David Lindley
    Summary of a September 2010 forum about online privacy held in Washington, D.C.

    Viewpoints: Broadening Participation
    The Role of Hispanic-Serving Institutions in Contributing to an Educated Work Force by Ann Quiroz Gates
    The author argues that supporting the efforts of minority serving institutions to become stronger institutions provides an additional tool for encouraging broader participation from underrepresented groups in science, technology, engineering and mathematics fields.

    Viewpoints
    We Need a Research Data Census by Francine Berman
    An argument is made for a Research Data Census to take periodic snapshots of the digital data landscape. Such a census could provide guidance in decisions about data storage and management across the country.

    Practice
    The Theft of Business Innovation: An ACM-BCS Roundtable on Threats to Global Competitiveness by Mache Creeger
    A roundtable discussion among security and policy experts on the new security threat to business information.

    Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

    ACM Washington Update Vol. 15.2 (March 16 2011)

    CONTENTS

    [1] Newsletter Highlights
    [2] 2010 ACM A.M Turing Award Recognizes Les Valiant
    [3] USACM Supports Defense Against FY ‘11 Cuts
    [4] USACM Comments on Federal Trade Commission Online Privacy Report
    [5] USACM Joins Statement of Concern Over Expansion of Intercept Law
    [6] Senate Passes Patent Reform Bill
    [7] About USACM

    [An archive of all previous editions of Washington Update is available at http://www.acm.org/usacm/update/]


    [1] NEWSLETTER HIGHLIGHTS

    Contrary to press reports, there are other things going on in Washington besides the budget negotiations. There are more details on each item below, as well as on our weblog at:
    http://www.acm.org/usacm/weblog:

    * Les Valiant wins A.M Turing Award for his work in computer science theory.

    * USACM joined with other numerous other organizations on a letter urging the Senate to to resist deep cuts to science agency budgets approved recently by the House of Representatives.

    * USACM submitted comments in response to FTC’s preliminary staff report concerning online privacy. The report outlines a proposed privacy framework.

    * USACM signed on to a statement developed by the Center for Democracy and Technology in response to possible changes to the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA).

    * The Senate passed a bill intended to reform the patent system.


    [2] 2010 ACM A.M. TURING AWARD RECOGNIZES LES VALIANT

    Les Valiant, the T. Jefferson Coolidge Professor of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics at Harvard’s School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, has been recognized for his work in machine learning and the theory of computation with the 2010 ACM A.M. Turing Award. The Award, which comes with a $250,000 prize, is supported in part by Intel and Google, and is considered the top prize in computing. It is named for the British mathematician Alan Turing, who was instrumental in the early development of modern computing.

    Over his career, Dr. Valiant has made notable contributions to several parts of computer science theory. He helped establish the foundation of computer learning theory. Valiant also developed the concept of complexity of enumeration and a theory of algebraic computation. His work in parallel and distributed computing theory is also well regarded.

    Read more about Dr. Valiant’s work:
    http://www.acm.org/news/featured/turing-award-2010


    [3] USACM SUPPORTS DEFENSE AGAINST FY ‘11 CUTS

    USACM signed a letter sent to the Senate leadership early in March urging them to resist the deep cuts to science agency budgets approved by the House of Representatives. The cuts would be for the remainder of the current fiscal year. The letter was organized by the Task Force on American Innovation; over 170 organizations have signed on.

    The basic argument of the letter was to encourage the continued doubling path for the National Science Foundation, National Institute of Standards and Technology, and the Office of Science at the Department of Energy. Echoing language from the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, the letter indicates that even in a time of cuts and savings there is still a need for investment in education, infrastructure, and research and development, especially to help support needed economic growth. The proposed cuts work counter to that need for investment.

    The final resolution of this budget debate may be soon, or another temporary measure may have to be passed. The current continuing resolution that funds the government is scheduled to expire on March 18.

    The full letter can be read online at:
    http://www.aplu.org/NetCommunity/Document.Doc?id=3023


    [4] USACM COMMENTS ON FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ONLINE PRIVACY REPORT

    On February 18th, USACM submitted comments in response to the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) preliminary staff report concerning online privacy. Titled “Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change,” the report outlines a proposed privacy framework involving the following general principles:

    - Companies should integrate privacy into their regular business operations (a Privacy by Design approach)

    - Consumer choice needs to be presented in a more streamlined fashion than current practice

    - Companies should increase the transparency all of their data practices, including those in the parts of their business that don’t engage with consumers directly.

    The FTC also sought comment on the development and use of a Do Not Track policy comparable to the Do Not Call list to reduce telemarketing calls. USACM encouraged the FTC in its comments to define Do Not Track in a way that was technology neutral. It is also important to have a Do Not Track system that allows for a variety of consumer choices. There must be some options between track everything and track nothing so that consumers can really craft a personalized Internet experience that reflects their preferences. Additionally, USACM repeated its arguments for a dataflow-based lexicon and enhanced privacy risk models to help ensure consumer privacy online.

    The full report can be read online at:
    http://ftc.gov/os/2010/12/101201privacyreport.pdf

    ACM’s comments can be read online at:
    http://usacm.acm.org/PDF/Commerce_Department_Online_Privacy_Comments_USACM.pdf


    [5] USACM JOINS STATEMENT OF CONCERN OVER EXPANSION OF INTERCEPT LAW

    In the middle of February the Center for Democracy and Technology released a statement it developed to respond to possible changes to the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). USACM is one of the organizations that signed the statement.

    The statement was developed due to press reports that there are efforts within the executive branch to expand the law, which requires companies to modify their electronic telecommunications equipment to facilitate wiretaps for law enforcement and other purposes. Originially passed in 1994, CALEA has been expanded to address changes in technology. However, as the statement indicates,

    “Clearly, lawful electronic surveillance plays an important role in enabling government agencies to fulfill their obligations to stop crime and to protect national security. These goals, however, must be reconciled with other important societal values, including cybersecurity, privacy, free speech, innovation and commerce.”

    The statement goes on to address significant concerns that need to be covered for future changes to laws that deal with electronic communications. It is important to preserve trust in communications systems.This can be achieved by safeguarding cybersecurity, not compromising encryption, protecting privacy and promoting accountability. If these steps (which are given more detail in the statement) are taken, the nation can support innovation and competitiveness interests while preserving lawful interests in electronic surveillance.

    There is no specific proposal to change CALEA at the present time. But there is enough of a concern about making sure electronic communications remain secure and productive that a statement like the one CDT issued makes sense.

    The full report can be read online at:
    http://www.cdt.org/pr_statement/statement-concern-about-expansion-calea


    [6] SENATE PASSES PATENT REFORM BILL

    On March 8 the Senate passed a bill intended to reform the patent system. S. 23, the Patent Reform Act of 2011, would take steps to harmonize the U.S. patent system with those in the rest of the world. The most notable change amongst them is to make the U.S. system based on the first to file rather than the first to invent. The bill also allows for relevant third parties to file information with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). This information would assist USPTO examiners with the evaluation of the patent. And perhaps most importantly, the bill makes necessary changes to the USPTO that allow it greater control over the fee money that it collects and the ability to establish satellite offices (the first one is planned for Detroit).

    The entire Bill can be read online at:

    http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s23/text


    [7] ABOUT USACM

    USACM is the U.S. Public Policy Committee of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery (www.acm.org), unites computing educators, researchers and professionals to inspire dialogue, share resources and address the field’s challenges. ACM strengthens the computing profession’s collective voice through strong leadership, promotion of the highest standards, and recognition of technical excellence. ACM supports the professional growth of its members by providing opportunities for life-long learning, career development, and professional networking.

    USACM acts as the focal point for ACM’s interaction with the U.S. Congress and government organizations. It seeks to educate and assist policy-makers on legislative and regulatory matters of concern to the computing community.

    For more information about USACM and ACM, see:

    http://www.acm.org/usacm/about.html


    BACK ISSUES

    For earlier editions of the ACM Washington Update, see:

    http://www.acm.org/usacm/update/

    SUBSCRIBE/UNSUBSCRIBE

    To subscribe to ACM’s Washington Update newsletter, send an e-mail to listserv@acm.org with “subscribe WASHINGTON-UPDATE “First Name” “Last Name” (no quotes) in the body of the message.

    To unsubscribe, simply include the “SIGNOFF WASHINGTON-UPDATE” command in an email to listserv@acm.org.

    As an alternative, enter your email address at: http://optout.acm.org/listserv_index.cfm?ln=washington-update and we’ll remove you.

    If in the future you’d like to re-subscribe, please enter your address at

    http://signup.acm.org/listserv_index.cfm?ln=washington-update

    Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of March 14

    March 14

    Hearing:

    The Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on promoting and protecting Internet commerce
    4 p.m., 2141 Rayburn Building

    March 15

    Hearing:

    The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on the Freedom of Information Act in the digital age
    10:15 a.m., 226 Dirksen Building

    March 16

    Hearing:

    The Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee will have a hearing on the state of online consumer privacy.
    10 a.m., 253 Russell Building

    Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection and Security Technologies Subcommittee of the House Homeland Security Committee will hold a hearing on cyber threats to critical infrastructure.
    10 a.m., 311 Cannon Building

    March 17

    Briefing
    The American Chemical Society is sponsoring a briefing on supercomputing for science and economic competitiveness
    noon, Capitol Visitors Center

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    Senate Passes Patent Reform Bill

    On March 8 the Senate passed a bill intended to reform the patent system. S. 23, the Patent Reform Act of 2011, would take steps to harmonize the U.S. patent system with those in the rest of the world. The most notable change amongst them is to make the U.S. system based on the first to file rather than the first to invent. The bill also allows for relevant third parties to file information with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). This information would assist USPTO examiners with the evaluation of the patent. And perhaps most importantly, the bill makes necessary changes to the USPTO that allow it greater control over the fee money that it collects and the ability to establish satellite offices (the first one is planned for Detroit).

    The full text of the bill is available online. How quickly the House will address the bill is unclear.

    Posted in Intellectual Property | Comments closed

    2010 ACM A.M. Turing Award Recognizes Les Valiant

    Les Valiant, the T. Jefferson Coolidge Professor of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics at Harvard’s School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, has been recognized for his work in machine learning and the theory of computation with the 2010 ACM A.M. Turing Award. The Award, which comes with a $250,000 prize, is supported in part by Intel and Google, and is considered the top prize in computing. It is named for the British mathematician Alan Turing, who was instrumental in the early development of modern computing.

    Over his career, Dr. Valiant has made notable contributions to several parts of computer science theory. His 1984 paper, “A Theory of the Learnable” helped establish the foundation of computer learning theory. Valiant developed the concept of complexity of enumeration and a theory of algebraic computation. His work in parallel and distributed computing theory is also notable, advanced new models, strategies and algorithms that moved the field forward.

    Congratulations to Dr. Valiant on receiving the 2010 ACM A.M. Turing Award. You can learn more about Dr. Valiant’s work and the Turing Award via the ACM website and press release.

    Posted in ACM/USACM News, Miscellaneous | Comments closed

    USACM Supports Defense Against FY ‘11 Science Cuts

    USACM signed a letter sent to the Senate leadership last week urging them to resist the deep cuts to science agency budgets approved recently by the House of Representatives. The cuts would be for the remainder of the current fiscal year. The letter was organized by the Task Force on American Innovation and over 165 organizations have signed on.

    The basic argument of the letter was to encourage the continued doubling path for the National Science Foundation, National Institute of Standards and Technology, and the Office of Science at the Department of Energy. Echoing language from the Task Force letter supporting the COMPETES legislation and from the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, the letter indicates that even in a time of cuts and savings there is still a need for investment in education, infrastructure, and research and development, especially to help support needed economic growth. The proposed cuts work counter to that need for investment.

    The final resolution of this budget debate may be soon, as the current continuing resolution that funds the government is scheduled to expire on March 18.

    Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of March 7

    March 8

    Meeting:

    The President’s Council of Advisers on Science and Technology will meet
    10 a.m., Marriott Metro Center, 775 12th Street NW, Washington, D.C. (webcast also available)

    March 9

    Meeting:

    The Data Privacy and Integrity Advisory Committee of the Department of Homeland Security will meet.
    1 p.m., Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street, NW ? 8th Floor, Washington, D.C.

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of February 28

    March 2

    Meeting

    The Information Security and Privacy Advisory Board will hold one of its periodic meetings.
    8:30 a.m., Homewood Suites by Hilton, 1475 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. (continues through March 4, meeting should be webcast)

    March 3

    Information Security and Privacy Advisory Board meeting continues (see March 2)
    8:30 a.m., 1475 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.

    March 4

    Information Security and Privacy Advisory Board meeting concludes (see March 2)
    8:30 a.m., 1475 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    USACM Comments on Federal Trade Commission Online Privacy Report

    On February 18th, USACM submitted comments in response to the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) preliminary staff report concerning online privacy. Titled “Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change,” the report outlines a proposed privacy framework involving the following general principles:

  • Companies should integrate privacy into their regular business operations (a Privacy by Design approach)
  • Consumer choice needs to be presented in a more streamlined fashion than current practice
  • Companies should increase the transparency all of their data practices, including those in the parts of their business that don?t engage with consumers directly.
  • The FTC also sought comment on the development and use of a Do Not Track policy comparable to the Do Not Call list to reduce telemarketing calls.

    As the focus of the report shares significant overlap with the online privacy report from the Internet Policy Task Force at the Department of Commerce, there is also a fair amount of overlap between USACM’s comments to the FTC and its comments to the Department of Commerce. USACM comments to the FTC discuss the need for a dataflow-based lexicon and enhanced privacy risk models, as did our comments to the Department of Commerce.

    These comments did spend some time outlining how to approach a possible Do Not Track system. Recognizing that a Do Not Track option is an effort to move beyond standard opt-in and opt-out choices, USACM encouraged the FTC to define Do Not Track in a way that was technology neutral. It is also important to have a Do Not Track system that allows for a variety of consumer choices. There must be some options between track everything and track nothing so that consumers can really craft a personalized Internet experience that reflects their preferences.

    The comments submitted are just a part of the entire process the FTC is going through to develop new guidance for improving consumer privacy online. A final report, or even proposed regulations, are several months away.

    Posted in ACM/USACM News, Privacy and Security | Comments closed

    USACM Joins Statement of Concern Over Expansion of Intercept Law

    Today the Center for Democracy and Technology released a statement it developed to respond to possible changes to the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). USACM is one of the organizations that signed on to the statement.

    The statement was developed due to press reports that there are efforts within the executive branch to expand the law, which requires companies to modify their electronic telecommunications equipment to facilitate wiretaps for law enforcement and other purposes. Originially passed in 1994, CALEA has been expanded to address changes in technology. However, as the statement indicates,

    “Clearly, lawful electronic surveillance plays an important role in enabling government agencies to fulfill their obligations to stop crime and to protect national security. These goals, however, must be reconciled with other important societal values, including cybersecurity, privacy, free speech, innovation and commerce.”

    The statement goes on to address significant concerns that need to be covered for future changes to laws that deal with electronic communications. It is important to preserve trust in communications systems. This can be achieved by safeguarding cybersecurity, not compromising encryption, protecting privacy and promoting accountability. If these steps (which are given more detail in the statement) are taken, the nation can support innovation and competitiveness interests while preserving lawful interests in electronic surveillance.

    Again, there is no specific proposal to change CALEA at the present time. But there is enough of a concern about making sure electronic communications remain secure and productive that a statement like the one CDT issued makes sense.

    Posted in ACM/USACM News, Privacy and Security | Comments closed

    ACM Washington Update Vol. 15.1 (February 16 2011)

    CONTENTS

    [1] Newsletter Highlights
    [2] USACM Comments on Proposed Web Accessibility Guidance
    [3] USACM Responds to Department of Commerce Online Privacy Report
    [4] Computers Freedom And Privacy Conference 2011
    [5] NITRD Program Asked for Input on K-12 Computer Science Education
    [6] President Signs COMPETES Act Reauthorization
    [7] About USACM

    [An archive of all previous editions of Washington Update is available at


    [1] NEWSLETTER HIGHLIGHTS

    There are more details on each item below, as well as on our weblog at:

    http://www.acm.org/usacm/weblog:

    * USACM submitted comments to the Department of Justice on how to help make websites compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

    * USACM responds to the Internet Policy Task Force online privacy report by recommending implementation of Fair Information Practice Principles (FIPPs) as well as additional tools for modeling privacy risks.

    * The 2011 Computers, Freedom and Privacy Conference will be June 14th through 16 in Washington, D.C. This year’s conference theme is “The Future is Now.”

    * The federal Networking and Information Technology Research and Development program sought input on some key questions about K-12 CS education.

    * President Obama signed into law the reauthorization of the America COMPETES Act, which supports continued increases in federal support for physical sciences research.


    [2] USACM COMMENTS ON PROPOSED WEB ACCESSIBILITY GUIDANCE

    The Department of Justice requested comments on some proposed regulations it is working on for website compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). USACM recently submitted comments which included the following recommendations on how to encourage websites covered by the ADA to be compliant.

    * Promote Awareness – The public does not have a full understanding of the Americans with Disabilities Act and how it already applies to the Web or how improving accessibility can often be an inexpensive process. Educational resources aimed at improving awareness of the ADA, how it might apply to particular Web sites, and how Web site developers and operators might improve accessibility can reduce resistance and increase compliance.

    * Encourage Tool and Software Development – The department should encourage tool and software development to make it easier for developers and content providers to design accessible Web page and Web services.

    * Adopt the Section 508 Standards – Section 508 standards are currently required for government Web sites. It will be easier for Web developers and builders to work with a uniform standard rather than one set for federal Web sites and another for non-federal sites that must be ADA-compliant. For that reason we recommend adopting the Section 508 standards over the WCAG 2.0 standards

    * Voluntary Certification – We recommend that the Department establish a voluntary certification program for Web sites to demonstrate to visitors that the site is compliant with accessibility standards. This would complement the awareness promotion we recommend.

    * Lead by Example – Besides ensuring its own compliance with the ADA, federal government leadership in making its own Web sites compliant will help uncover useful tools and best practices that developers and builders can use in non-governmental Web sites.

    * Seek Clarity About Compliance – While the ADA already applies to the Web, there exists no guidance about what must comply, how to comply, and who is responsible for what parts of the compliance process, including auditing.

    * Encourage Compliance, Not Removal – Depending on how standards are set, implemented and supported, some Web sites may find it easier to remove content rather than comply with the law. Recognizing that the ADA already has undue burden provisions, the Department should still make sure that people understand the standards and how they can be achieved with reasonable means.

    This is the first step in what is likely a long-term process for the Department to draft rules, consult with groups affected by these rules, and finalize those rules.

    The full response can be read online at:
    http://usacm.acm.org/PDF/USACM_Response_to_DOJ_ANPRM.pdf


    [3] USACM RESPONDS TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMERECE ONLINE PRIVACY REPORT

    In December the Internet Policy Task Force (a Commerce Department group drawing on expertise from the Patent and Trademark Office, the International Trade Administration, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration) released a report on commercial data privacy. This followed the release earlier that month of a Federal Trade Commission report about online privacy.

    USACM submitted comments on the report. A major theme of the comments was that Fair Information Practice Principles (FIPPs) are good (and should be broadly implemented), but they are insufficient in themselves for ensuring data privacy in an age of rapidly shifting practices and technological capabilities. USACM strongly encourages the use of three additional items to help strengthen online privacy protection.

    A dataflow-based lexicon – The lexicon would help define flows of personal information and provide meaningful references terms. This will assist in managing the variety of different purposes for which information could be used online and be adaptable to reflect changing technologies.

    Enhanced privacy risk models – FIPPs do not adequate address norms and harms, which means that practices that are otherwise compliant with FIPPs could be contrary to what a reasonable person would expect or cause harms. An enhanced privacy risk model would address context and harms, as well as be able to adapt for changes in technology and how those changes affect currently held assumptions about privacy.

    Privacy Impact Assessments (PIA) – A practice followed by some government agencies when implementing particular policies, PIAs can help spread the use of enhanced privacy risk models and FIPPs.

    With both the Department of Commerce and the Federal Trade Commission spending significant time over online privacy, it is possible that the executive branch may take significant action in this area. In turn, this could motivate Congress to go further in developing online privacy legislation than it has in the past.

    The full comments can be read online at:
    http://usacm.acm.org/PDF/Commerce_Department_Online_Privacy_Comments_USACM.pdf


    [4] COMPUTERS FREEDOM AND PRIVACY CONFERENCE 2011

    The Computers, Freedom and Privacy Conference (CFP) will take place this year June 14 through the 16th in Washington D.C. ACM is one of the conference sponsors.

    This year’s theme is “The Future is Now. The CFP, the 21st, will take place at the Georgetown University Law Center. The conference, as the name suggests, tackles issues involving the intersections of computing, privacy, and related freedoms. More information will be available soon.

    The conference organizers have released their call for submissions. The early bird deadline is March 15, and the final deadline is April 1.

    Find out more at the conference website:
    http://www.cfp.org/2011/wiki/index.php/Main_Page


    [5] NITRD PROGRAM ASKED FOR INPUT ON K-12 COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCAITION

    The federal government asks for advice about education fairly regularly. But it isn’t often that it asks specifically what is needed to advance K-12 computer science education. So it was a pleasant surprise when one federal program asked some key questions about K-12 CS education. Members of our community had the opportunity to speak up about what they think is needed for a stronger K-12 CS education.

    Prompted by a report from the Presidents top science advisors, The Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Program (NITRD) asked three sets of big and open-ended questions:

    * What CS concepts are important to effective elementary, secondary, and post-secondary curricula? Among these concepts, which are commonly found in curricula today? Which are missing?

    * What do teachers need (including preparation and training, tools, and resources) to be able to deliver CS education effectively?

    * What factors are important in promoting student interest in CS?

    Comments had to be submitted by January 31.


    [6] PRESIDENT SIGNS COMPETES ACT REAUTHORIZATION

    President Obama signed into law the reauthorization of the America COMPETES Act. The bill continues (among other things) the increasing funding trend for the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the National Science Foundation, and the Office of Science at the Department of Energy started with the American Competitiveness Initiative introduced by President Bush. USACM and ACM’s Education Policy Committee co-authored a letter in support of the bill back in May of 2010, specifically focusing on the parts of the legislation that support science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education.

    Besides extended support for STEM education and increased federal funding for physical science research, the COMPETES reauthorization applies to the Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy, and gives federal agencies and departments the authority to conduct prize competitions, which is part of President Obama’s Strategy for American Innovation. The funding allowed in the bill will have to be appropriated by Congress, so the fight for the continued budget support is far from over.


    BACK ISSUES

    For earlier editions of the ACM Washington Update, see:

    http://www.acm.org/usacm/update/

    SUBSCRIBE/UNSUBSCRIBE

    To subscribe to ACM’s Washington Update newsletter, send an e-mail to
    listserv@acm.org with “subscribe WASHINGTON-UPDATE “First Name” “Last Name”
    (no quotes) in the body of the message.

    To unsubscribe, simply include the “SIGNOFF WASHINGTON-UPDATE” command in an
    email to listserv@acm.org.

    As an alternative, enter your email address at http://optout.acm.org/listserv_index.cfm?ln=washington-update and we’ll remove you.

    If in the future you’d like to re-subscribe, please enter your address at

    http://signup.acm.org/listserv_index.cfm?ln=washington-update

    Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of February 14

    This week the President released his Fiscal Year 2012 budget request. As a result, there will be several events, many of them today, where federal agencies discuss their portion of the request. Congressional hearings on this request will follow over the next few weeks.

    February 15

    Hearing:

    The Committee on House Administration will hold a hearing on military and overseas voting in the 2010 election.
    10:30 a.m., 1310 Longworth Building

    The Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on Internet competition
    1:30 p.m., 2141 Rayburn Building

    February 16

    Hearing:

    The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on websites dedicated to stealing intellectual property.
    10 a.m., 226 Dirksen Building

    February 17

    Hearing:

    The Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on lawful surveillance and new technologies.
    10 a.m., 2141 Rayburn Building

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    DC ACM Chapter Co-Hosts Discussion on Digital Government

    On February 17th, the D.C. Chapter of the Association for Computing Machinery and the New America Foundation will co-host a panel discussion, “The Open Government Directive: A Year Later.” The Open Government Directive was established by the Obama Administration in order to encourage the disclosure of more federal information online in a usable and accessible fashion for the public. It’s part of a larger Open Government Initiative that includes the development of websites like Data.gov. The event is scheduled to run from 5:30 to 7 p.m. at the New American Foundation offices in Washington.

    Participants in the discussion are:

    Panelists
    Tom Lee
    Sunlight Foundation

    Andrew McLaughlin
    Previous White House Deputy Chief Technology Officer

    Elana Berkowitz (invited)
    Open Technology Initiative Fellow
    New America Foundation

    Moderator
    Tom Glaisyer
    New America Foundation

    Part of what they hope to address in the discussion are some important issues related to the massive release of data associated with the Initiative. These issues include:

    • How are companies and organizations using this new government data?
    • What challenges are there in aggregating the various data sources?
    • What are the policies/barriers to the use of third-party tools to enhance the usefulness of this new information? And is this new openness helping provide citizens with better access and higher-quality information?

    For more information and to register, visit the event’s webpage. Any video taken of the event should be available at that page after the event takes place.

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of February 7

    February 10

    Hearing:

    The Immigration Policy and Enforcement Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on the E-Verify program, an electronic employment eligibility verification system.
    10 a.m., 2141 Rayburn Building

    Markup:

    The House Science, Space and Technology Committee will meet to formally organize.
    2 p.m., 2318 Rayburn Building

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    Policy Highlights from Communications of the ACM – November 2010 (Vol. 53, No. 11)

    Below is a list of items with policy relevance from the November issue of Communications of the ACM. As always, much of the material in CACM is premium content, and free content one month may slip behind a pay wall the next. You need to be a member of ACM or a subscriber to CACM to access premium content online.

    ACM Member News, by Jack Rosenberger
    Chris Stephenson, Executive Director of the Computer Science Teachers Association and member of the ACM Education Policy Committee, is interviewed about K-12 computer science education in the U.S.

    News: Technology
    Security in the Cloud by Gary Anthes
    The author outlines security challenges involved with cloud computing (including a lack of clear regulatory or legal guidance) and what researchers are doing to address them.

    News: Society
    Career Opportunities by Leah Hoffman
    Computer science graduates face a reasonably strong labor market, and Hoffman discusses what else is bringing students back to the field.

    News: Emerging Technology
    Wide Open Spaces by Neil Savage
    A brief outline of the possibilities for the recent Federal Communications Commission decision to open frequencies in the broadcast spectrum.

    Viewpoints: Legally Speaking
    Why Do Software Startups Patent (or Not)? by Pamela Samuelson
    Samuelson discusses a recent article that analyzes the 2008 Berkeley Patent Survey.

    Viewpoints: Privacy and Security
    Why Isn’t Cyberspace More Secure? by Joel F. Brenner
    Brenner discusses the perpetual trend of federal cyberspace reviews that yield little progress, and what federal actions could be taken to improve Internet security.

    Contributed Articles
    Regulating the Information Gatekeepers by Patrick Vogel and Michael Barrett
    The authors examine whether or not search-engine ranking should be regulated, at least in part to counter inappropriate search engine optimization and other targeted manipulation of search engine rankings.

    Review Articles
    Using Complexity to Protect Elections by Piotr Faliszewski, Edith Hemaspaandra, and Lane A. Hemaspaandra
    The authors outline an approach to protecting elections where the election is made computationally prohibitive to prohibitive.

    Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

    USACM Responds to Department of Commerce Online Privacy Report

    Last month the Internet Policy Task Force (a Commerce Department group drawing on expertise from the Patent and Trademark Office, the International Trade Administration, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration) released a report on commercial data privacy. This complemented the release in the same month of a Federal Trade Commission report about online privacy.

    Responding to the report, and to some of the specific questions the Task Force wants answers for, USACM submitted comments. A major theme of our comments is that Fair Information Practice Principles (FIPPs) are good (and should be broadly implemented), but they are insufficient in themselves for ensuring data privacy in an age of rapidly shifting practices and technological capabilities. We strongly encourage the use of three additional items to help strengthen online privacy protection.

    A dataflow-based lexicon – The lexicon would help define flows of personal information and provide meaningful references terms. This will assist in managing the variety of different purposes for which information could be used online and be adaptable to reflect changing technologies.

    Enhanced privacy risk models – FIPPs do not adequate address norms and harms, which means that practices that are otherwise compliant with FIPPs could be contrary to what a ‘reasonable’ person would expect or cause harms. An enhanced privacy risk model would address context and harms, as well as be able to adapt for changes in technology and how those changes affect currently held assumptions about privacy.

    Privacy Impact Assessments (PIA) – A practice followed by some government agencies, such impact assessments can help spread the use of enhanced privacy risk models.

    Privacy and security doesn’t have to be an either/or proposition. By following practices like those suggested in USACM’s comment, both privacy and security can be attained.

    Read our press release as well as our full comments online.

    Posted in ACM/USACM News, Privacy and Security | Comments closed

    Save the Date – Computers, Freedom and Privacy Conference 2011

    The Computers, Freedom and Privacy Conference (CFP) will take place this year June 14 through the 16th in Washington D.C. ACM is one of the conference sponsors.

    This year’s theme is “The Future is Now.” The CFP, the 21st, will take place at the Georgetown University Law Center. The conference, as the name suggests, tackles issues involving the intersections of computing, privacy, and related freedoms. More information should be available soon at the conference website -http://www.cfp.org/2011/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

    ADDED – February 7 – the conference organizers have released their call for submissions. The early bird deadline is March 15, and the final deadline is April 1.

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    USACM Comments on Proposed Web Accessibility Rules

    The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was passed in 1990, and did not address the Internet. However, the Department of Justice established, most notably through a case involving Target, established that the ADA provisions applied to websites. However, the Department has not been forthcoming with guidance on how websites can be made compliant with the ADA. That is about to change.

    The Department requested comment on some possible rules it is working on for website compliance with the ADA. USACM recently submitted comments addressing the topic in general, and some of the specific questions asked by the Department. You can also read the ACM press release on the subject.

    The following are the recommendations USACM submitted to the Department of Justice. Our full response is available online.

    • Promote Awareness ? The public does not have a full understanding of the Americans with Disabilities Act or how it already applies to the Web. Nor does it understand how improving accessibility of Web sites can often be a relatively inexpensive process. Educational resources aimed at improving awareness of the ADA, how it might apply to particular Web sites, and how Web site developers and operators might improve accessibility can reduce resistance and increase compliance.
    • Encourage Tool and Software Development ?The department should encourage tool and software development to make it easier for developers and content providers to design accessible Web page and Web services. Improved tools for testing and auditing Web accessibility might provide clearer feedback and assistance in improving accessibility, thus simplifying the process of bringing sites into compliance.
    • Adopt the Section 508 Standards ? The current use of Section 508 standards for government Web sites gives them an edge over the WCAG 2.0 standards. It will be easier for Web developers and builders to work with a uniform standards rather than one set for federal Web sites and another for non-federal sites that must be ADA-compliant.
    • Voluntary Certification ? We recommend that the Department establish a voluntary certification program for Web sites to demonstrate to visitors that the site is compliant with accessibility standards. This would complement the awareness promotion we recommend.
    • Lead by Example ? Besides ensuring its own compliance with the ADA, federal government leadership in making its own Web sites compliant will help uncover useful tools and best practices that developers and builders can use in non-governmental Web sites.
    • Seek Clarity About Compliance ? While the ADA already applies to the Web, there exists no guidance about what must comply, how to comply, and who is responsible for what parts of the compliance process, including auditing. Answering those questions must inform the rulemaking process, and resources must be available to make sure people who have these questions can have them answered once compliance becomes a requirement.
    • Encourage Compliance, Not Removal ? Depending on how standards are set, implemented and supported, some Web sites may find it easier to remove content rather than comply with the law. Recognizing that the ADA already has undue burden provisions, the Department should still make sure that people understand the standards and how they can be achieved with reasonable means.
    Posted in ACM/USACM News, Web Accessibility | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of January 31

    January 31

    Event:

    The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation will host an event on the bandwidth cost of online piracy.
    noon, 1101 K Street NW

    February 2

    Briefing:

    The National Immigration Law Center will hold a briefing on the impacts of a mandatory electronic employment verification scheme.
    10 a.m., 2456 Rayburn Building

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    Let the Feds Know Your Thoughts on K-12 Computer Science Education

    The federal government asks for advice about education fairly regularly. But it isn’t often that it asks specifically what is needed to advance K-12 computer science education. So I was pleasantly surprised when one federal program asked some key questions about K-12 CS education. Members of our community have the opportunity to speak up about what they think is needed for a stronger K-12 CS education. (Comments are due by January 31.)

    Prompted by a report from the President’s top science advisors, The Networking and Information and Technology Research and Development Program (NITRD) asked three sets of big and open-ended questions:

    “The Presidents Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) report calls for fundamental changes in K-12 STEM education in the United States, including the incorporation of computer science (CS) as an essential component.

    • What CS concepts are important to effective elementary, secondary, and post-secondary curricula? Among these concepts, which are commonly found in curricula today? Which are missing?
    • What do teachers need (including preparation and training, tools, and resources) to be able to deliver CS education effectively?
    • What factors are important in promoting student interest in CS?;

    PCAST is the President’s high-level body of science and technology advisors, and the report to which these questions refer was issued in mid-December about recommendations for improving the NITRD program. So, what is NITRD? I blogged about it long ago; in short PCAST notes it is, “… the primary mechanism by which the Federal government coordinates its unclassified networking and information technology (NIT) research and development (R&D) investments.” A smallish part of this portfolio deals with investments and workforces issues and their obvious connection to the R&D enterprise.”

    ACM’s Education Policy Committee has been pushing NITRD and PCAST on the numerous policy issues that K-12 CS Education faces. In response, PCAST recommended in an earlier K-12 STEM education report that computer science should called out by policy makers as a critical part of the STEM agenda. This new report reaches the same conclusion and prods NITRD to take steps to ensure CS is an “essential component” in K-12. These questions represent the program’s first steps to meet this goal.

    This is a great opportunity for educators from the computing community that work on K-12 CS education issues, curriculum, instruction or generally anything in the subject. It isn’t often that the community gets asked for advice on these issues. We should take advantage by filing comments on their questions.

    Posted in Education and Workforce | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of January 10

    January 13

    Meeting:

    The Technical Guidelines Development Committee of the Elections Assistance Commission will meet (continues January 14)
    8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m., 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD (also webcast)

    January 14

    Meeting:

    The Technical Guidelines Development Committee of the Elections Assistance Commission continues its meeting.
    8:30 a.m.-2:30 p.m., 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD (also webcast)

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    President Signs COMPETES Reauthorization

    On Tuesday President Obama signed into law the reauthorization of the America COMPETES Act. The bill continues (among other things) the increasing funding trend for the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the National Science Foundation, and the Office of Science at the Department of Energy started with the American Competitiveness Initiative introduced by President Bush. USACM and ACM’s Education Policy Committee co-authored a letter in support of the bill back in May of 2010, specifically focusing on the parts of the legislation that support science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education.

    Besides extended support for STEM education and increased federal funding for physical science research, the COMPETES reauthorization applies to the Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy, and gives federal agencies and departments the authority to conduct prize competitions, part of President Obama’s Strategy for American Innovation.

    It’s important to note here that this reauthorization bill does not appropriate funds, but establishes the authority to spend up to certain amounts. At the moment, the federal government is operating under a continuing resolution where programs are funded at the levels established for the previous fiscal year. As one party has expressed interest in cutting the federal budget by as much as $100 billion for non-defense and non-security spending, it is possible that federal research may not be funded at the levels authorized by this bill.

    Posted in Innovation | Comments closed

    ACM Washington Update Vol. 14.5 (January 2011)

    CONTENTS

    [1] Newsletter Highlights
    [2] FCC Draws Line in the Net Neutrality Sand
    [3] Computer Science Education Week Extends its Reach
    [4] USACM Vice Chair Felten Appointed as First FTC Chief Technologist
    [5] Web Accessibility Bill Becomes Law
    [6] USACM Expresses Concern Over Intellectual Property Piracy Bill
    [7] ACM and CSTA Release Report Outlining Challenges in K-12 Computer Science Education
    [8] About USACM

    [An archive of all previous editions of Washington Update is available at
    http://www.acm.org/usacm/update/]


    [1] NEWSLETTER HIGHLIGHTS

    There are more details on each item below, as well as on our weblog at http://www.acm.org/usacm/weblog:

    * The Federal Communications Commission opened the next phase in the arguments over net neutrality by issuing rules to ‘preserve the Internet as an open network.’
    * The second annual Computer Science Education Week was a resounding success, building on the good work of the previous year’s event.
    * USACM Vice-Chair Edward Felten has been appointed as the first Chief Technologist of the Federal Trade Commission. He starts his new position on January 4.
    * In October legislation to expand accessibility of Internet Protocol-based communications and video services was signed into law.
    * USACM expressed concern in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee about the implementation of a proposed bill to fight online infringement and counterfeiting of intellectual property.
    * ACM and the Computer Science Teachers Association combined forces to produce Running on Empty, a report assessing the challenges facing K-12 computer science education across the country.


    [2] FCC DRAWS LINE IN THE NET NEUTRALITY SAND

    In what is arguably the end of the beginning of the fights over net neutrality, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted 3-2 on December 21 to establish rules intended to “preserve the Internet as an open network enabling consumer choice, freedom of expression, user control, competition and the freedom to innovate.” Since both court and legislative challenges were anticipated well in advance of this vote, and each of the five Commissioners has a different take on the order (their statements are available at the FCC website, http://www.fcc.gov), the vote is the start of something, rather than the end. Preliminary reactions from the public suggest a division of opinion comparable (but perhaps not identical) to that of the Commission.

    The order is explained as part of OpenInternet.gov, and the full text is available at:

    http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2010/db1223/FCC-10-201A1.pdf

    There are three basic rules:

    Transparency: Providers of broadband Internet service must publicly disclose information about their network management practices and terms of services to allow consumers to make informed choices and for application/service/content/device providers to develop their products and services for operation on those networks.

    No Blocking: Providers of fixed broadband Internet services (this includes cable modems, DSL, and fixed wireless – though there is some confusion in press reports on this last point) cannot block lawful services, applications, content or non-harmful devices, unless subject to reasonable network management. The same is true for applications that might compete with providers’ telephony services (for example, this should ensure that Voice Over Internet Protocol or Skype services can be used on a Comcast or Verizon network).

    No Unreasonable Discrimination: Providers of fixed broadband services cannot unreasonably discriminate in transmitting lawful network traffic to consumers. Reasonable network management does not constitute unreasonable discrimination.

    The FCC is pointedly exempting mobile networks (primarily cellular telephones) from the last two rules, under the presumption that the infrastructure and/or competitors in this space are not sufficiently mature to allow for completely open network management. This will likely be a point of contention in some circles, but will not likely attract as much attention as the fights over whether the FCC is within its authority to establish these rules, or whether the need for such rules exists. Those fights should last for years.


    [3] COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION WEEK EXTENDS ITS REACH

    The 2nd annual Computer Science Education Week (CSEdWeek) wrapped up December 11, and it was a smashing success. With a new website (http://www.csedweek.org) providing targeted resources and more than 270 CSEdWeek-related events and activities we were able to engage students, parents, teachers and the computing community around the world.

    What started out last year has grown into a full fledged community effort supported by the United States Congress. This year’s effort was a collaborative effort of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), National Science Foundation (NSF), Computer Science Teachers Association (CSTA), National Center for Women & IT (NCWIT), WGBH, Computing Research Association (CRA), Anita Borg Institute for Women in Technology (ABI), Microsoft, Google, SAS, Intel, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). CSEdWeek is also a major awareness building activity of a new coalition called Computing in the Core (http://www.computinginthecore.org/), a non-partisan advocacy coalition of associations, corporations, scientific societies, and other non-profits that strive to elevate computer science education to a core academic subject in K-12 education.

    This year we asked the computing community and our partners to get out and spread the word about the impact of computing and the dire need for better computer science education. We had a diversity of pledges from around the world to hold events and carry out activities. The Canadian universities were particularly active, with more than 25 campuses hosting CSEdWeek events ranging from computing camps to public videos and various student competitions to CSUnplugged sessions.

    CSEdWeek received almost 1700 pledges of support from 45 states in the US (in addition to DC, Guam and Puerto Rico) and 34 other countries. 45% of the pledges came from Massachusetts and California, while the highest pledging cities included Marlborough and Shrewsbury, Massachusetts and Irvine, California. Over 33% of the support pledges came from K-12 students, 17% from college students, and 15% from K-12 teachers. These statistics indicate that we achieved our goal of engaging students and teachers as well as the computing community around the world.

    Note: This is a edited version of a post at Blog@CACM, the blog connected to Communications of the ACM It was written by Debra Richardson, Chair of the 2010 Computer Science Education Week, and ACM Director of Public Policy, Cameron Wilson.

    Full Post available at: http://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/102979-computer-science-education-week-extends-its-reach/fulltext


    [4] USACM VICE CHAIR FELTEN APPOINTED AS FIRST FTC CHIEF TECHNOLOGIST

    Ed Felten, noted computer science researcher, Director of Princeton’s Center for Information Technology Policy, and one of USACM’s Vice Chairs, has been appointed Chief Technologist at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). This is a new position for the Commission (the Federal Communications Commission has had one for years), and Felten will serve for a one-year term.
    As Chief Technologist, Felten will advise the Commission on emerging technology and policy issues. Felten is no stranger to Washington, having testified before Congress and consulted with the Justice and Defense Departments, in addition to his previous work for the FTC. Congratulations to Ed on his appointment!


    [5] WEB ACCESSIBILITY BILL BECOMES LAW

    In October the President signed into law the 21st Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010. Spearheaded by Representative Edward Markey of Massachusetts, the law will apply standards of accessibility to online services. Provisions of the law include:

    • Extend general accessibility provisions for equipment that provides voice communication to include Voice over Internet Protocol, electronic messaging and video conferencing services.
    • Video programming shown with captions on televisions must also provide captions if transmitted over the Internet.
    • Emergency information shown on television or similar display devices must also provide some audio to reach those with visual impairments.
    • User interfaces for equipment that displays video information must be accessible, and any associated remote control must have a captioning button.
    • On-screen guides and text menus provided by navigation devices must also be accessible.

    The full text of the law is available at http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s111-3304


    [6] USACM EXPRESSES CONCERN OVER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PIRACY BILL

    In late September the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA) was introduced and quickly moved to a markup and vote by the Senate Judiciary Committee. The bill as written would allow the Justice Department to command changes in Internet services to restrict the ability of pirate websites to operate. While USACM supports the goal of the bill – to restrict the actions of intellectual property infringers and counterfeiters – there are sufficient legal, regulatory and technical questions on the enforcement of the bill that warrant a more careful consideration and examination of the bill. USACM sent a letter to the Chair and Ranking Member of the Committee to that effect, supporting other letter sent by public interest, library and commercial groups.

    The bill made it through the Senate Judiciary Committee in November, but ultimately stalled in the waining session of the 111th Congress. Senator Coburn noted the various letters expressing concerns about the bill at the time of the letter. The Senate may revisit it during the new, 112th Congress, which convenes in early January.


    [7] ACM AND CSTA RELEASE REPORT OUTLINING CHALLENGES IN K-12 COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION

    At a National Press Club event on October 6, ACM and the Computer Science Teachers Association (CSTA) released its report Running on Empty. According to the report, roughly two-thirds of the country have few computer science education standards for secondary school education, and most states treat high school computer science courses as simply an elective and not part of a student’s core education. Given the increasing importance of computer science and computing in everyday life, this is a serious problem. Read the full report at the link below, or download PDF versions of the full report and executive summary.

    The release of the report was part of the announcement of Computing in the Core, a non-partisan advocacy coalition focused on building a strong K-12 education program in computer science. Both ACM and CSTA are members, along with other associations, corporations, scientific societies and non-profits all committed to this goal. You can read more about Computing in the Core at the website or in the press release announcing the coalition and highlighting conclusions from Running on Empty.

    Report – http://www.acm.org/runningonempty/
    Computing in the Core website – http://www.computinginthecore.org
    Coalition Press Release – http://www.acm.org/press-room/news-releases/2010/education-paradox


    [8] ABOUT USACM

    USACM is the U.S. Public Policy Committee of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery www.acm.org, unites computing educators, researchers and professionals to inspire dialogue, share resources and address the field’s challenges. ACM strengthens the computing profession’s collective voice through strong leadership, promotion of the highest standards, and recognition of technical excellence. ACM supports the professional growth of its members by providing opportunities for life-long learning, career development, and professional networking.

    USACM acts as the focal point for ACM’s interaction with the U.S. Congress and government organizations. It seeks to educate and assist policy-makers on legislative and regulatory matters of concern to the computing community.

    For more information about USACM and ACM, see:

    http://www.acm.org/usacm/about.html


    BACK ISSUES

    For earlier editions of the ACM Washington Update, see:

    http://www.acm.org/usacm/update/

    SUBSCRIBE/UNSUBSCRIBE

    To subscribe to ACM’s Washington Update newsletter, send an e-mail to
    listserv@acm.org with “subscribe WASHINGTON-UPDATE “First Name” “Last Name”
    (no quotes) in the body of the message.

    To unsubscribe, simply include the “SIGNOFF WASHINGTON-UPDATE” command in an
    email to listserv@acm.org.

    As an alternative, enter your email address at http://optout.acm.org/listserv_index.cfm?ln=washington-update and we’ll remove you.

    If in the future you’d like to re-subscribe, please enter your address at

    http://signup.acm.org/listserv_index.cfm?ln=washington-update

    Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

    FCC Draws Line in the Net Neutrality Sand

    In what is arguably the end of the beginning of the fights over net neutrality, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted yesterday, 3-2 to establish rules intended to “preserve the Internet as an open network enabling consumer choice, freedom of expression, user control, competition and the freedom to innovate.” Since both court and legislative challenges were anticipated well in advance of yesterday’s vote, and each of the five Commissioners has a different take on the order (their statements are available at the FCC website), the vote is the start of something, rather than the end. Preliminary reactions from the public suggest a division of opinion comparable (but perhaps not identical) to that of the Commission.

    The order is explained as part of OpenInternet.gov, but the full text is not currently available. There are three basic rules:

    Transparency: Providers of broadband Internet service must publicly disclose information about their network management practices and terms of services to allow consumers to make informed choices and for application/service/content/device providers to develop their products and services for operation on those networks.

    No Blocking: Providers of fixed broadband Internet services (this includes cable modems, DSL, and fixed wireless – though there is some confusion in press reports on this last point) cannot block lawful services, applications, content or non-harmful devices, unless subject to reasonable network management. The same is true for applications that might compete with providers’ telephony services (in other words, this should ensure that Voice Over Internet Protocol or Skype services can be used on a Comcast or Verizon network).

    No Unreasonable Discrimination: Providers of fixed broadband services cannot unreasonably discriminate in transmitting lawful network traffic to consumers. Reasonable network management does not constitute unreasonable discrimination.

    The FCC is pointedly exempting mobile networks (primarily cellular telephones) from the last two rules, under the presumption that the infrastructure and/or competitors in this space are not sufficiently mature to allow for completely open network management. This will likely be a point of contention in some circles, but will not likely attract as much attention as the fights over whether the FCC is within its authority to establish these rules, or whether the need for them exists. Those fights should last for years, absent bad behavior from a broadband provider.

    Posted in Miscellaneous | Comments closed

    Commerce Department and Federal Trade Commission Seek Guidance on Online Privacy

    In the first half of December the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Commerce Department’s Internet Policy Task Force (IPTF) each issued reports focused on privacy online. In both cases the reports are meant as the next step in a process of consultation and feedback between these agencies, the public, and relevant stakeholders. As the Congress has struggled and failed to advance online privacy legislation over the last several years, it may be the executive branch that provides the best chance for future government action on privacy online. Comments are being taken on each report, and must be submitted by late January.

    The FTC report was released on December 1. Titled “Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change,” the report provides a detailed history of the Commission’s activities in the area of online privacy, including the two models that guide their enforcement actions – notice-and-choice (consumers must be given notice and choice when their information is collected) and harm-based (actions caused specific kinds of harm to consumers). Recognizing that the landscape of information collection is changing rapidly, the Commission believes a new consumer privacy framework is in order. It’s outlined on page ix (13 in the digital copy) and explained in further detail starting on page 39 (53 in the digital copy). The basic principles are:

    • Companies should integrate privacy into their regular business operations (a Privacy by Design approach)
    • Consumer choice needs to be presented in a more streamlined fashion than current practice
    • Companies should increase the transparency all of their data practices, including those in the parts of their business that don’t engage with consumers directly


    Of particular note is the FTC’s recommendation to adopt a Do-Not-Track capability, perhaps in a browser setting, that would provide the kind of online protection comparable to the Do-Not-Call registry to prevent calls from telemarketers.

    The Commerce Department’s IPTF released its report on December 16. The Task Force is coming from a slightly different perspective than the Commission. The Commerce Department’s mission is to support domestic commercial activity, so the Task Force wants to make sure privacy can be protected without undue burden to companies. The Commission is more concerned with ensuring proper trade practices and protecting consumer interests.

    That said, both reports emphasize following at least some of what are considered fair information practice principles (FIPPs). The FTC considers those to be notice, choice, consent, access, security and enforcement. Other constructions of FIPs (which informed the USACM privacy policy) include guidance on data minimization and data retention.

    The IPTF report focuses on FIPPs in several of its recommendations (described in further detail in Appendix A, with related questions for which the Task Force seeks public comment):

    • Adopt a baseline commercial data privacy framework (which the report calls a Dynamic Privacy Framework) built on an expanded set of FIPPs.
    • FIPPs regarding enhancing transparency; encouraging greater detail in purpose specifications and use limitations; and fostering the development of verifiable evaluation
      and accountability should receive high priority.
    • Voluntary, enforceable codes of conduct should address emerging technologies and issues not covered by current application of baseline FIPPs. To encourage the development of such codes, the Administration should consider a variety of options, including (a) public statements of Administration support; (b) stepped up FTC enforcement; and © legislation that would create a safe harbor for companies that adhere to appropriate voluntary, enforceable codes of conduct that have been developed through open, multistakeholder processes.
    • Using existing resources, the Commerce Department should establish a Privacy Policy Office (PPO) to serve as a center of commercial data privacy expertise. The proposed PPO would have the authority to convene multi-stakeholder discussions of commercial data privacy implementation models, best practices, codes of conduct, and other areas that would benefit from bringing stakeholders together; and it would work in concert with the Executive Office of the President as the Administration?s lead on international outreach on commercial data privacy policy. The PPO would be a peer of other Administration offices and components that have data privacy responsibilities; but, because the PPO would focus solely on commercial data privacy, its functions would not overlap with existing Administration offices. Nor would the PPO would have any enforcement authority.
    • The FTC should remain the lead consumer privacy enforcement agency for the U.S. Government.
    • The U.S. government should continue to work toward increased cooperation among privacy enforcement authorities around the world and develop a framework for mutual recognition of other countries? commercial data privacy frameworks. The United States should also continue to support the APEC Data Privacy Pathfinder project as a model for the kinds of principles that could be adopted by groups of countries with common values but sometimes diverging privacy legal frameworks.
    • Consideration should be given to a comprehensive commercial data security breach framework for electronic records that includes notification provisions, encourages companies to implement strict data security protocols, and allows States to build upon the framework in limited ways. Such a framework should track the effective protections that have emerged from State security breach notification laws and policies.
    • A baseline commercial data privacy framework should not conflict with the strong sectoral laws and policies that already provide important protections to Americans, but rather should act in concert with these protections.
    • Any new Federal privacy framework should seek to balance the desire to create uniformity and predictability across State jurisdictions with the desire to permit States the freedom to protect consumers and to regulate new concerns that arise from emerging technologies, should those developments create the need for additional protection under Federal law.
    • The Administration should review the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), with a view to addressing privacy protection in cloud computing and location-based services. A goal of this effort should be to ensure that, as technology and market conditions change, ECPA continues to appropriately protect individuals? expectations of privacy and effectively punish unlawful access to and disclosure of consumer data.

    Again, both reports have requested public comment. Check the relevant notices for the IPTF and FTC reports for specific instructions.

    Posted in Privacy and Security | Comments closed

    PCAST Issues Report on NITRD program

    On December 16 the President’s Council of Advisers on Science and Technology (PCAST) issued the latest in its Congressionally required assessments of the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development program (NITRD). The report is now available at:

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-nitrd-report-2010.pdf

    You can watch the webcast of the report release here: http://www.tvworldwide.com/events/pcast/101216/

    If you want to review a condensed version of the report, check out the press release or this briefing from Ed Lazowska, one of the co-chairs of the report, at the November PCAST meeting.

    The introductory letter in the report offers a good summary of the report’s conclusions (NIT – Networking and Information Technology):

    “PCAST finds that NITRD is well coordinated and that the U.S. computing research community, coupled with a vibrant NIT industry, has made seminal discoveries and advanced new technologies that are helping to meet many societal challenges. Importantly, however, PCAST also finds that a substantial fraction of the NITRD multi-agency spending summary represents spending that supports R&D in other fields, rather than spending on R&D in the field of NIT itself. As a result, the Nation is actually investing far less in NIT R&D than the $4 billion-plus indicated in the Federal budget. To achieve America?s priorities and advance key research frontiers to support economic competitiveness in NIT, this report calls for a more accurate accounting of this national investment and recommends additional investments in NIT R&D, including research in networking and information technology for health, energy and transportation, and cyber-infrastructure, among others.”

    The conclusions about how NITRD money is spent is not an allegation of inappropriate spending. The finding is that NITRD spending is not typically reported with sufficient detail to ensure that the funds are spent on research and development in NIT. What they find is a lot of spending on infrastructure and applications of NIT that should really count as infrastructure and applications spending in other fields.

    The report recommendations are spread across several areas:

    Helping Achieve America’s Priorities (NIT work directed toward health care, transportation, security, education, etc.)
    Investing in Research Frontiers (includes HPC, trustworthy systems, cybersecurity, scalable systems)
    Technological and Human Resources (focused on research infrastructure and relevant STEM education)
    NITRD Coordination Process and Structure (strengthen the coordination capacity of NITRD and its coordinating office, and expand the reach of the program)

    Chief Technology Officer Vivek Kundra indicated that they were seeking public comment on the report, though the official Federal Register notice has not been published yet. According to this page from the NITRD website, comments are due January 31.

    Posted in Miscellaneous | Comments closed

    Computer Science Education Week Extends Its Reach

    This is a repost from Blog@CACM, the blog connected to Communications of the ACM It was written by Debra Richardson, Chair of the 2010 Computer Science Education Week, and ACM Director of Public Policy Cameron Wilson.

    The 2nd annual Computer Science Education Week (CSEdWeek) wrapped up last week, and thanks to some incredible partner support and engagement from the computing community it was a smashing success. With a new website providing targeted resources and more than 270 CSEdWeek-related events and activities we were able to engage students, parents, teachers and the computing community around the world.

    What started out last year as an idea by Professor Joel Adams (Calvin College) has grown into a full fledged community effort supported by the United States Congress. This year’s effort, Chaired by Debra Richardson (one of the authors of this article), was a collaborative effort of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), National Science Foundation (NSF), Computer Science Teachers Association (CSTA), National Center for Women & IT (NCWIT), WGBH, Computing Research Association (CRA), Anita Borg Institute for Women in Technology (ABI), Microsoft, Google, SAS, Intel, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). CSEdWeek is also a major awareness building activity of a new coalition called Computing in the Core, a non-partisan advocacy coalition of associations, corporations, scientific societies, and other non-profits that strive to elevate computer science education to a core academic subject in K-12 education.

    This year we asked the computing community and our partners to get out in their communities and spread the word about the impact of computing and the dire need for better computer science education. They answered the call. We had a diversity of pledges from around the world to hold events and carry out activities.

    Here is a small sampling:

    • The University of California, Berkley hosted more than 250 students at an all-day event featuring activities and speakers
    • In Woodridge, Illinois a teacher launched a tech club in her junior high school
    • Microsoft in Cambridge, MA hosted 50 technology- and accounting-focused high school students
    • A K-12 teacher in India conducted an activity called Inter-House Computer Science Quiz, which was designed by students to test the level of computer science knowledge in high school students.
    • The ACM Student Chapter at The City University of New York (CUNY) visited the CUNY High Performance Computing Center
    • Multiple campuses of the University of Toronto hosted approximately 340 9th grade students and their teachers for a full-day event exploring computer science with hands-on workshops and large-group sessions.

    The Canadian universities were particularly active, with more than 25 campuses hosting CSEdWeek events ranging from computing camps to public videos and various student competitions to CSUnplugged sessions.

    We also saw some major national coverage of CSEdWeek this year. The White House blog featured CSEdWeek as story of the week and tweeted a celebratory message in binary! The US Secretary of Education, Arne Duncan, highlighted CSEdWeek on his blog. And our major corporate partners spread the word with Microsoft’s CTO, Google’s Director of Education, and SAS’s CEO highlighting computer science education week to their employees, customers, and the public at large.

    CSEdWeek received almost 1700 pledges of support from 45 states in the US (in addition to DC, Guam and Puerto Rico) and 34 other countries. 45% of the pledges came from Massachusetts and California, while the highest pledging cities included Marlborough and Shrewsbury, Massachusetts and Irvine, California. Over 33% of the support pledges came from K-12 students, 17% from college students, and 15% from K-12 teachers. These statistics indicate that we achieved our goal of engaging students and teachers as well as the computing community around the world.

    These were all noteworthy accomplishments for CSEdWeek, which is really still in its infancy, but our work isn’t over. We need the computing communities support and engagement over the next 12 months in building to next year’s celebration to make it even bigger. There a few things you can still do to support CSEdWeek:

    • Pledge your support for CSEdWeek;
    • Become a supporter and get involved with Computing in the Core, which will do outreach on K-12 issues throughout the year review;
    • If you held an event or did an activity for the week tell us your story (and if you held an event or did an activity and didn’t pledge, go ahead and pledge first and then tell us your story);
    • Check out the resources we have complied to showcase computer science education; and,
    • Review the events held this year and begin planning for what you might do during CSEdWeek 2011.

    Thank you to all those involved in this year’s celebration, and we look forward to even bigger and better CSEdWeek in 2011!

    Posted in ACM/USACM News, Education and Workforce | Comments closed

    White House Issues Federal IT Reform Plan

    Last Thursday the national Chief Information Officer (CIO), Vivek Kundra, issued an implementation plan for reforming federal information technology. It’s a very detailed effort, and some parts of the plan will require Congressional authorization. The full plan is available online.

    As Mr. Kundra explains in a blog post, the plan comes as part of an ongoing effort by the Office of Management and Budget to take a close look at federal information technology projects to try and rein in cost overruns and other wasteful spending. The results he lists so far are notable:

    The bottom line is that we?ve reduced lifecycle cost by $1.3 billion, and cut the time for delivery of functionality down by more than half, from two to three years down to an average of 8 months.

    In reviewing 38 total projects, we have significantly accelerated delivery in 12 projects, with increased functionality coming online every few quarters rather than every few years, and reduced the scope or terminated 15 others, achieving a total of $3 billion in lifecycle budget reductions.

    The plan represents an acceleration of present efforts to review, change or terminate existing projects, many of them within the next 18 months. Perhaps the most significant part of the plan is a shift of computing to ‘the cloud,’ where each agency would move three services it provides to the cloud within 18 months (2 of them within 12 months). Depending on the nature of the services and anticipated demand, the clouds used could be commercially available, developed and operated by the federal government, or in conjunction with state and local agencies. Ensuring security of these clouds and the privacy of the associated data should be foremost on the minds of agency staff as they effect this transition. Unfortunately, privacy is not mentioned in that section of the plan.

    The move to the cloud represents the biggest technology shift in the plan. Most of the plan is focused on management reform, either through changes to the processes of federal information technology (IT) management; adjustments in hiring and training of IT professionals; and better coordination of technology cycles, the federal budget, and procurement practices. It’s this last category that will require the most collaboration with Congress, and represents perhaps the biggest challenges and the biggest savings for the government.

    The parts of the plan that do not need Congressional approval will move forward right away. You should be able to monitor at least some of the progress via the CIO’s website as well as various information technology dashboards either currently established or soon to be developed. Some of the deadlines for the plan are six months from now, so this should be a busy area of activity almost immediately.

    Posted in Digital Government, Privacy and Security | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of November 29

    December 2

    Hearing:
    The Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection of the House Energy and Commerce Committee will hold a hearing on ‘do-not-track’ legislation. This would establish something similar to the do-not-call list for websites.
    10:30 a.m., 2123 Rayburn Building

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    Start December with an Update on Social Innovation

    Happy Thanksgiving, everyone.

    December starts with an opportunity to learn more about new developments in social innovation – digital tools that help connect people with each other and with organizations. On the first the New America Foundation will host an event on technology, social innovation and civic participation. Researchers from the University of Maryland (including USACM member Ben Shneiderman) will discuss their recent work examining both the advantages and challenges of new social interaction technologies.

    The event will take place at the New America Foundation’s offices in Washington from 3:30 to 4:45 on Wednesday, December 1st.

    New America Foundation
    1899 L Street NW Suite 400
    Washington, DC, 20036

    Registration in encouraged.

    Posted in Events, Innovation | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of November 22

    November 22

    Event:

    The AAAS Center for Science, Technology and Security Policy will host a panel discussion on cybersecurity moderated by former national cybersecurity adviser Richard Clarke. USACM Chair Gene Spafford is part of the panel.
    3 p.m., 1200 New York Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    Cybersecurity Policy Discussion Will Include USACM Chair

    On November 22, former national cybersecurity adviser Richard Clarke will discuss cybeersecurity and cybersecurity policy at the AAAS in Washington, D.C. As part of the discussion, a panel of experts will join Mr. Clarke to discuss the challenges of forming and implementing government cybersecurity policy. One of those experts is USACM Chair Eugene Spafford. He will be joined by Larry Clinton, President of the Internet Security Alliance, and Alex Howard, Government 2.0 correspondent for O’Reilly Media.

    The event will take place from 3-5 p.m. at AAAS headquarters in Washington, D.C.

    1200 New York Avenue, N.W., Second Floor
    Washington, D.C., 20005

    The event is hosted by the AAAS Center for Science, Technology and Security Policy. An RSVP is requested.

    Posted in ACM/USACM News, Events | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of November 15

    Congress returns to Washington this week for a ‘lame-duck’ session. Beyond some kind of budget action, the legislative agenda is a bit uncertain.

    November 17

    Hearing:

    The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee will hold a hearing on securing critical infrastructure.
    10:30 a.m., 342 Dirksen Building

    November 18

    Markup:

    The Senate Judiciary Committee will meet to mark pending legislation and vote on nominations. The legislation scheduled to be covered includes the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act, which USACM weighed in on in September.
    10 a.m., 226 Dirksen Building

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    USACM Vice Chair Felten Appointed as First FTC Chief Technologist

    Ed Felten, noted computer science researcher, Director of Princeton’s Center for Information Technology Policy, and one of USACM’s Vice Chairs, has been appointed Chief Technologist at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). This is a new position for the Commission (the Federal Communications Commission has had one for years), and Felten will serve for a one-year term.

    As Chief Technologist, Felten will advise the Commission on emerging technology and policy issues. Felten is no stranger to Washington, having testified before Congress and consulted with the Justice and Defense Departments, in addition to his previous work for the FTC. Congratulations to Ed on his appointment!

    Posted in ACM/USACM News, Innovation | Comments closed

    Policy Highlights from Communications of the ACM – October 2010 (Vol. 53, No. 10)

    Below is a list of items with policy relevance from the October issue of Communications of the ACM. As always, much of the material in CACM is premium content, and free content one month may slip behind a pay wall the next. You need to be a member of ACM or a subscriber to CACM to access premium content online.

    News: Society
    Should Code be Released? by Dennis McCafferty
    The author covers the various pros and cons behind disclosing software code connected to scientific research.

    Contributed Articles
    How Offshoring Affects IT Workers by Prasanna B. Tambe and Lorin M. Hitt
    The authors present an analysis of survey data on how offshoring affects the U.S. work force. They find that jobs dealing with more personal delivery of products or services are much less likely to be sent offshore.

    Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

    ACM and CSTA Release Report Outlining Challenges in K-12 Computer Science Education

    At a National Press Club event earlier today, ACM and the Computer Science Teachers Association (CSTA) released its report Running on Empty. According to the report, roughly two-thirds of the country have few computer science education standards for secondary school education, and most states treat high school computer science courses as simply an elective and not part of a student?s core education. Given the increasing importance of computer science and computing in everyday life, this is a serious problem. Read the full report at the above link, or download PDF versions of the full report and executive summary.

    The release of the report was part of the announcement of Computing in the Core, a non-partisan advocacy coalition focused on building a strong K-12 education program in computer science. Both ACM and CSTA are members, along with other associations, corporations, scientific societies and non-profits all committed to this goal. You can read more about Computing in the Core at the website or in the press release announcing the coalition and highlighting conclusions from Running on Empty.

    Posted in ACM/USACM News, Education and Workforce | Comments closed

    National Academies Releases Report on Cyberattack Deterrence

    Coming from a call for papers and workshop held earlier this year, the Computer Science and Telecommunications Board of the National Academies has released Proceedings of a Workshop on Deterring CyberAttacks: Informing Strategies and Developing Options for U.S. Policy. The report focuses on the papers presented at a June workshop, and range from general technical examinations of cyberattacks and deterrence to cover connections with privacy, international laws and agreements, and how to best organize efforts at deterrence.

    In addition to the papers, the reports include the letter report the study group submitted to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. It focuses on describing the nature of the problem and identifying important questions related to preventing, discouraging and reducing cyberattacks against U.S. cyberinfrastructure.

    Posted in Privacy and Security | Comments closed

    Policy Highlights from Communications of the ACM – September 2010 (Vol. 53, No. 9)

    Below is a list of items with policy relevance from the September issue of Communications of the ACM. As always, much of the material in CACM is premium content, and free content one month may slip behind a pay wall the next. You need to be a member of ACM or a subscriber to CACM to access premium content online.

    News: Technology
    Cycling Through Data by Neil Savage
    Sensor-equipped bicycles are functioning as moving data sources for riders, researchers and policy makers.

    News: Society
    Degrees, Distance and Dollars by Marina Krakovsky
    While technology has arguably made online education cheaper to provide, this is not typically reflected in tuition rates. Online education also thrives more in specialized, masters and doctoral programs than in bachelors programs.

    Column: Law and Technology
    Principles of the Law of Software Contracts by Robert A. Hillman and Maureen A. O’Rourke
    The American Law Institute has developed a new set of legal principles for software contracts. The principles, as well as the tensions brought out in the drafting process, are the focus of this article.

    Column: The Profession of IT
    Discussing Cyber Attack by Peter J. Denning and Dorothy E. Denning
    With reports of government activity in the area of cyber attack and exploitation, it’s past time that discussions take place with computer professionals about it, if for no better reason than to improve capacity in cyber defense.

    Practice
    Computers in Patient Care: The Promise and the Challenge by Stephen V. Cantrill
    The author, a doctor with over thirty years experience in medical informatics, reviews the areas where computers have had significant and less-than-significant impact on patient care.

    Last Byte: Future Tense
    Little Brother Is Watching by Greg Bear
    The author outlines a potential future where surveillance is everywhere and regular citizens participate in the watching and reporting.

    Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

    USACM Expresses Concern About IP Piracy Enforcement Bill

    The Senate Judiciary Committee recently introduced the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act to fight piracy of intellectual property. That is an appropriate goal for Congress to pursue, but the means by which it would happen in the proposed legislation raised concerns amongst several commercial, library and public interest groups. As currently written, the bill would shut down piracy sites by having a court order the Domain Name System to not resolve the URL for the website. Additionally the Justice Department can then act to have companies that provide services to websites stop providing for the pirate site. There are serious questions of how these actions would be implemented, whether or not there are sufficient due process provisions, and the challenges of acting internationally via domestic law.

    As a result of these questions and others, USACM sent a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee expressing its concerns, and associating itself with a letter signed by several public-interest, commercial and library groups. A previously scheduled markup session for this bill was postponed until after the November elections, so perhaps some of these concerns will be addressed by the committee at that time.

    Posted in Intellectual Property | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of September 27

    September 28

    The Data Privacy and Integrity Advisory Committee of the Department of Homeland Security will meet.
    8:30 a.m., Carl Hayden Room, Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    Policy Highlights from Communications of the ACM – August 2010 (Vol. 53, No. 8)

    Below is a list of items with policy relevance from the August issue of Communications of the ACM. As always, much of the material in CACM is premium content, and free content one month may slip behind a pay wall the next. You need to be a member of ACM or a subscriber to CACM to access premium content online.

    News: Society
    Making Sense of Real-Time Behavior by Sarah Underwood
    An article covering ‘reality mining’ – data capture and analysis from networks of sensors worn on the human body.

    Viewpoints: Education
    Preparing Computer Science Students for the Robotics Revolution by David S. Touretzky
    The author outlines how robotics holds the potential to transform computer science curriculum, assuming certain impediments are dealt with.

    Viewpoints: Privacy and Security
    Remembrances of Things Pest by Eugene Spafford
    The USACM Chair reviews past malware anniversaries as a means to re-emphasize the factors behind malware and the ways it could be reduced.

    Viewpoints
    Rights for Autonomous Artificial Agents? by Samir Chopra
    A discussion of how shopping bots and similar autonomous programs could or should function within existing legal frameworks.

    Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of September 20

    September 22

    Hearing:

    The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.
    10 a.m., 226 Dirksen Building

    The Consumer Protection, Product Safety and Insurance Subcommittee of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee will hold a hearing on S. 3742, the Data Security and Breach Notification Act of 2010.
    2:30 p.m., 253 Russell Building

    September 23

    Hearing:

    The Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties of the House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.
    11 a.m., 2141 Rayburn Building

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    CS Education Gets Congressional Attention

    Last week was a huge one for computer science education in the Nation’s Capital. Congressmen from both parties introduced two pieces of legislation – The Computer Science Education Act and the Computer Science Education Week Resolution – intended to help strengthen computer science education. I’ve written before that the road to education reform is long, and progress will come in fits and starts. Both pieces of legislation represent another step along this road and the beginning of a much broader engagement to bring attention to computer science education issues in the United States.
    Read More »

    Posted in ACM/USACM News, Education and Workforce | Comments closed

    USACM and SIGPLAN Comment on SEC Python Proposal

    The Securities and Exchange Commission recently issued a request for comments on proposed changes to the rules regulating asset-backed securities. Part of the suggested changes included a requirement to file a computer program of the contractual cash flow provisions expressed in a particular computer language – Python.

    In connection with ACM’s Special Interest Group for Programming Languages – SIGPLAN – USACM submitted comments addressing that proposed change.

    The detailed set of comments addresses some specific issues with the proposal, which include the need to make sure that all inputs and outputs for the program are at the same level of detail as the Asset Data File. Those issues prompted USACM and SIGPLAN to recommend the final proposal be run as a trial. A summary of the comments emphasizes the following points.
    Read More »

    Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of August 2

    The House is presently on recess until after Labor Day, and the Senate is scheduled to join them by the weekend.

    August 4 (Continues to noon on August 6)
    The Information Security and Privacy Board will meet to discuss a variety of matters.
    1221 22nd Street, NW, Washington, D.C.

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    Policy Highlights from Communications of the ACM – July 2010 (Vol. 53, No. 7)

    Below is a list of items with policy relevance from the July issue of Communications of the ACM. As always, much of the material in CACM is premium content, and free content one month may slip behind a pay wall the next. You need to be a member of ACM or a subscriber to CACM to access premium content online.

    News
    Sharing Computational Perspectives by David Lindley
    A review of recent projects in other disciplines that benefit from computer science expertise, including Federal Communications Commission spectrum auctions.

    Censored! by Samuel Greengard
    A description of how, and for what reasons, some countries censor Internet access and activity. Includes a discussion of means to breach efforts at Internet control.

    Viewpoints: Legally Speaking
    Should the Google Book Settlement Be Approved? by Pamela Samuelson
    Samuelson reviews the history of the Google Books class action suit and proposed settlement. She argues that the out-of-print works provisions of the settlement are counter to the open access preferences of academic writers.

    Viewpoints: Broadening Participation
    Cultivating Cultural Diversity in Information Technology by Valerie Taylor
    Describes the new Center for Minorities and People with Disabilities in IT, started in March 2010, and the reasons such a center is needed.

    Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

    House Passes Bill to Improve Accessibility on the Web

    The House recently passed H.R. 3101, the 21st Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act. Sponsored by Rep. Markey of Massachusetts, the bill seeks to apply standards of accessibility first encouraged by the Americans with Disabilities Act to online services. Specifically the bill would:

    • Extend general accessibility provisions for equipment that provides voice communication to include Voice over Internet Protocol, electronic messaging and video conferencing services.
    • Video programming shown with captions on televisions must also provide captions if transmitted over the internet.
    • Emergency information shown on television or similar display devices must also provide some audio to reach those with visual impairments.
    • User interfaces for equipment that displays video information must be accessible, and any associated remote control must have a captioning button
    • On-screen guides and text menus provided by navigation devices must also be accessible.

    A very similar bill sponsored by Senator Pryor is waiting for a floor vote in the Senate. While both bills read as though they were written for the technology of a few years ago, they do move accessibility standards into the 21st century.

    Posted in Web Accessibility | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of July 26

    July 27

    Hearing:

    The Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee will hold a hearing on consumer online privacy.
    2:30 p.m., 253 Russell Building

    July 28

    Hearing:

    The Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on online privacy, social networking and crime.
    2 p.m., 2141 Rayburn Building
    Read More »

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    USACM Comments on National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace

    In late June the White House issued a second Draft of the National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace. They opened a public comment process only on an Ideascale online space for three weeks. As a result, USACM was only able to generate a short list of comments on the draft strategy, which it submitted on July 19.

    The Draft Strategy proposes an Identity Ecosystem where trusted authorities would certify that an online identity does correspond to the individual that claims that identity. The idea is that this system would be voluntary, but would allow parties to place more trust in online transactions because the parties would be certified, and could allow people to reduce the number of identities (and the associated log-in names and passwords) that they would have to manage. While detailed, this strategy document is not a plan in the sense of having a specific timetable and particular technologies in mind. The document outlines general goals that the government must meet to establish this Identity Ecosystem. While this suggests that the strategy is a long way from being implemented, the short time frame for public comment suggests some pressure exists to move forward with this project relatively soon.

    Even without specific details or an implementation plan, there are some problems with the Strategy that USACM identified in its comments.
    Read More »

    Posted in ACM/USACM News, Privacy and Security | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of July 19

    July 20

    Hearing:
    The Health Subcommittee of the House Ways and Means Committee will hold a hearing on encouraging the use of Health Information Technology.
    1 p.m., 1000 Longworth Buiding

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    ACM Washington Update, Vol. 14.4 (July 9, 2010)

    CONTENTS

    [1] Newsletter Highlights
    [2] USACM and ACM’s Education Policy Committee Offer Support for COMPETES
    [3] USACM Releases Issue Brief on Internet Voting
    [4] USACM Comments on Internet Privacy Bill Discussion Draft
    [5] Yet Another Cybersecurity Bill Introduced in Congress
    [6] Federal Communications Commission Looks for Third Way to Address Broadband
    [7] About USACM

    [An archive of all previous editions of Washington Update is available at
    http://www.acm.org/usacm/update/]
    Read More »

    Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of July 12

    July 14

    Markup:

    The House Science and Technology Committee will markup pending legislation
    10 a.m., 2318 Rayburn Building

    July 15

    Hearing:

    The Technology and Innovation Subcommittee of the House Science and Technology Committee will hold a hearing on cyber attack attribution
    10 a.m., 2318 Rayburn Building

    July 16

    Meeting:

    The President’s Council of Advisers on Science and Technology will meet
    10 a.m., National Academies’ Keck Building, 500 5th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

    Posted in Events | Comments closed

    Policy Highlights from Communications of the ACM – June 2010 (Vol. 53, No. 6)

    Below is a list of items with policy relevance from the June issue of Communications of the ACM. As always, much of the material in CACM is premium content, and free content one month may slip behind a pay wall the next. You need to be a member of ACM or a subscriber to CACM to access premium content online.

    News
    Beyond the Smart Grid by Tom Geller
    While most references to the smart grid cover the potential impact on energy savings, the networking and monitoring of household devices have the potential to provide more benefits than a smaller utility bill.

    Privacy and Security
    Myths and Fallacies of ‘Personally Identifiable Information’ by Arvind Narayanan and Vitaly Shmatikov
    The exponential growth in the collection of data and the ability to sift through it quickly has weakened the ability to effectively disconnect data from the person it describes. This has significant consequences for policies that come from a time when de-identifying data was considered effective privacy protection on its own.

    Viewpoints: Law and Technology
    Intel’s Rebates: Above Board or Below the Belt? by François Lévêque
    A review of the antitrust case involving Intel and its use of rebate payments.

    Posted in ACM/USACM News | Comments closed

    USACM Releases Issue Brief on Military and Overseas Internet Voting

    The U.S. Public Policy Council of the Association for Computing Machinery (USACM) has developed an issue brief on internet voting as it relates to military and overseas voters. This issue brief is part of a series, which includes briefs on REAL ID and Electronic Employment Verification Systems.

    The brief focuses on the challenges of voting faced by military and overseas voters (UOCAVA voters). In the past there have been many problems with making sure that states can get registration and ballot materials to and from UOCAVA voters in a timely fashion. The recently passed MOVE (Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment) Act goes a long way in addressing those challenges, making it much easier for UOCAVA voters to register and vote. Some states allow for the transmission of registration information and blank ballots via the internet, and there is interest in transmitting cast ballots over the internet.
    Read More »

    Posted in ACM/USACM News, E-voting | Comments closed

    Hill Tech Happenings, Week of June 28

    July 1

    Hearing:

    The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee will hold a hearing on using cloud computing for federal information technology needs.
    10 a.m., 2154 Rayburn Building

    Posted in Events | Comments closed